You are here

Formation of individual productivity of winter durum wheat by its structural components depending on the fertilizer system

The individual productivity of winter durum wheat varies signifcantly depending on the fertilizer system in crop rotation, the effectiveness of which is determined by the weather conditions of the growing season. Stem density, tillering coefcients increase signifcantly due to the application of complete fertilizer. Variants of the experiment with incomplete return of phosphorus and potassium removed with crops do not signifcantly affect the structure of the crop. The amount of productive stems increased from 291 pcs/m2 in the version without fertilizers to 338 pcs/m2 or by 16 % for prolonged use of N75 in feld crop rotation and to 397 pcs/ m2, or by 36 % for N150. In the version with prolonged use of N75P30K40, this fgure was 19 %, and with the application of N150P60K80 – 43 % higher compared to unfertilized sites. Prolonged use of nitrogen-potassium and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer system in terms of the impact on the structure of the crop was at the level of the N150 application option. The number of productive stems in versions with incomplete return to the soil of phosphorus and potassium removed with crops was at the level of the variant with complete fertilizer (N150P30K40). The highest tillering coefcient was in the phase of plants entering the tube – 2.00–2.07, and by the end of the growing season it was decreasing. The lowest coefcient of productive tillering was at fully ripe stage of grain – 1.09–0.54 depending on the fertilizer system. The tendency to influence this indicator was similar to the density of stems. Application of 75 kg a.i./ha of nitrogen fertilizers increases the weight of grains and their number per ear. Increasing their dose up to 150 kg a.i./ha reduces the productivity of the ear. The weight of 1000 grains decreases for all fertilizer systems in crop rotation, but remains very high (≥ 35 g). On average over two years of research it was found that the weight of grain from one ear increased from 1.51 g in the version without fertilizers to 1.63 g or by 8 % with prolonged use of N75, and decreased to 1.45 g, or by 4 % in the version of application of 150 kg a.i./ha of nitrogen fertilizers. Prolonged use of N75P30K40 did not affect this fgure compared to the option of applying only 75 kg a.i./ ha of nitrogen fertilizers. In the N150P60K80 version, the grain weight from one ear was at the control level. The weight of 1000 grains of winter durum wheat in unfertilized sites was 43.0 g, and with the application of nitrogen fertilizers was 41.0–41.7 g. In 2020, the weight of 1000 grains was larger and made 41.5–43.3 g, while in 2021 – 40.3–42.6 g, depending on the version of the experiment. Grain yield was most affected by the nitrogen component in the fertilizer system.
Key words: winter durum wheat, fertilizer systems, components of crop structure, stability index.

 

Reference: 
1. Popov, A.S. (2019). Sroki poseva tverdoj ozimoj pshenicy [Time of sowing solid winter wheat]. Zernovoe khoziaistvo Rossyy [Grain farming of Russia], no. 6, pp. 28–32.
2. Samofalova, N.E., Dubinina, O.A., Samofalov, A.P., Ilichkina, N.P. (2019). Rol' meteofaktorov v formirovanii produktivnosti ozimoj tverdoj pshenicy [The role of meteorofactors in the formation of the productivity of winter solid wheat]. Zernovoe khoziaistvo Rossyy [Grain farming of Russia]. Vol. 5 (65), pp. 18–23.
3. Minekonomiky: Posivna 2020 na zavershalnii stadii [Ministry of Economy: Sowing 2020 is in its fnal stages.]. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/minekonomikiposivna-2020-na-zavershalnij-sta....
4. Liubych, V.V. (2017). Hlibopekars'ki vlastyvosti zerna sortiv pshenyci ozymoi' zalezhno vid vydiv, norm i strokiv zastosuvannja azotnyh dobryv [Bread properties of grain of wheat varieties of winter depending on types, norms and terms of nitrogen fertilizer application]. Visny`k Dnipropetrovs`kogo DAEU [Bulletin of Dnipropetrovs'k State Technical University]. Vol. 2, pp. 35–41.
5. Nelson, K.A., Motavalli, P.P., Nathan, M. (2014). Nitrogen fertilizer sources and application timing affects wheat and inter-seeded red clover yields on claypan soils. Agronomy. Vol. 4, pp. 497–513.
6. Ferrante, A., Savin, R., Slafer, G. (2015). Relationship between fruiting efciency and grain weight in durum wheat. Field Crops Research. Vol. 177, рp. 145–156.
7. Basaliy, V.V., Pankeev, S.V., Karushchuk, G.V. (2013). Urozhajnist' zerna sortiv pshenyci ozymoi' m’jakoi' ta tverdoi' zalezhno vid fonu zhyvlennja v umovah zroshennja pivdnja Ukrai'ny [Vintage grain of winter wheat varieties of soft and solid depending on the power supply in the conditions of irrigation of the south of Ukraine]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk [Taurian Scientifc Bulletin]. Vol. 84, pp. 3–10.
8. Kharchenko, O., Zakharchenko, E., Kovalenko, I., Prasol, V., Pshychenko, O., Mishchenko, Y. (2019). On problem of establishing the intensity level of crop variety and its yield value subject to the environmental conditions and constraints. AgroLife scientifc journal. Vol. 8, pp. 113–119.
9. Almaliev, M., Kostadinova, S., Panayotova, G. (2014). Effect of fertilizing systems on the phosphorus efciency indicators at durum wheat. Agriculture&Forestry. Vol. 60(4), pp. 127–134.
10. Gauer, L., Grant, C.A., Geht, D.T., Bailey, L.D. (1992). Effect of nitrogen fertilization mon grain protein contant, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen use efciency of six spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in relation to estimated moisture supply. Can. J. Plant Sci. Vol. 72, pp. 235–241.
11. Hannachi, A., Fellahi, Z.A., Bouzerzour, H., Boutekrabt, A. (2013). Correlation, Path Analysis and Stepwise Regression in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under Rainfed Conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability. Vol. 3(2), pp. 122–131.
12. Slafer, G.A., Savin, R., Sandras, V.O. (2014). Coarse and fne regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crop Res. Vol. 157, pp. 71–83.
13. Tsegaye, D., Dessalegn, T., Dessalegn, E., Share, G. (2012). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in durum wheat germplasm (Triticum durum Desf.). Agricultural Research and Reviews. Vol. 1(4), pp. 107–112.
14. Stacionarni pol'ovi doslidy Ukrai'ny: rejestr atestativ [Stationary feld experiments of Ukraine: register of certifcates]. Kyiv, Agrarian Science, 2014, 146 p.
15. Yeshchenko, V.O., Kopitko, P.G., Kostogriz, P.V., Oproshko, V.P. (2014). Osnovy naukovyh doslidzhen' v agronomii' [Fundamentals of scientifc research in agronomy]. Vinnitsa, PP TD Edelweiss and K, 332 p.
16. Hospodarenko, G.M., Liubych, V.V. (2021). Alelopatija roslynnyh reshtok na posivni vlastyvosti zerna pshenyci m’jakoi' ozymoi' [Alelopathy of plant residues on sowing properties of grain of soft winter wheat]. Zbirnyk Umanskoho NUS [A collection of Uman Nes]. Vol. 98, pp. 246–254.
17. Panayotova, G., Kostadinova, S., Valkova, N. (2015). Durum wheat quality as affected by genotype and nitrogen. Agronomy. Vol. 58, pp. 277–283.
18. Rustamov, Kh.N., Akparov, Z.İ., Abbasov, M.A. (2020). Adaptive potential of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) varieties of Azerbaijan. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. Vol. 181(4), рр. 9–15.
19. Mahmud, A.A. (2021). Growth, yield and its attributes of durum wheat as affected by sowing dates and seeding rates under Libyan conditions. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. Vol. 42, no.2, рр. 540–545.
20. Yasser, A.M. (2021). Hefny Response of some durum wheat genotypes (Triticum durum Desf.) for potassium fertilization levels in newly reclaimed soil. Scientifc Journal of Agricultural Sciences. Vol. 3 (1), рр. 66–78.
 
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon kalantir_2_2021-65-74.pdf436.44 KB