1. Celebioglu B., Roy J., Farmer A. A domestication change at PvMYB26 in common bean sheds light on the origins of Middle American agriculture. bioRxiv preprint. 2025. DOI: 10.1101/2025.05.15.654381.
2. Swamy K.R.M. Origin, domestication, taxonomy, botanical description, genetics and cytogenetics, genetic diversity and breeding of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Current Research. 2023. Vol. 15. P. 24766–24795.
3. Insights into the Genetics Underlying the Resistance to Root-Knot Nematode Reproduction in the Common Bean Ouro Negro / A.M. Pesqueira et al. Plants. 2025. 14(7). 1073 p. DOI: 10.3390/ plants14071073.
4. Kris H.K. The domestication of the common bean. ThoughtCo. 2020. URL:
https://www. thoughtco.com/domestication-of-the-commonbean-170080.
5. Common bean as a potential crop for future food security: An overview of past, current and future contributions in genomics, transcriptomics, transgenics and proteomics / M.A. Nadeem et al. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2021. Vol. 35. P. 759–787.
6. Can foliar application of natural biostimulants reduce nitrate and fiber content in fresh green bean under soil nutrient deficiency? / Z.F. Fawzy et al. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2023. Vol. 47. Art. 165. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-023-01135-5.
7. El Sheikha A.F., Allam A.Y., Taha M., Varzakas T. How does the addition of biostimulants affect the growth, yield, and quality parameters of the snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)? Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. Art. 776. DOI: 10.3390/app12020776.
9. Yield of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) depending on variety and fertilization / В. Панчишин та ін. Modern Engineering and Innovative Technologies. 2023. Vol. 4(26-04). P. 110–114. DOI: 10.30890/2567- 5273.2023-26-04-057.
10. Aghora T.S., Thangam M., Patil N. Legume vegetables for human nutrition and entrepreneurship. Vegetables for Nutrition and Entrepreneurship. Singapore: Springer, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19- 9016-8_20.
11. Nutritional properties of common bean protein concentrate compared to commercial legume ingredients for the plant-based market / L. De Paiva Gouvêa et al. Current Research in Food Science. 2024. Vol. 9. Art.100937. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100937.
12. Sundarakani B., Ghouse A. A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of blockchain technology for food security. Foods. 2024. Vol. 13. Art. 3607.
13. Agronomic methods aiming quality and production increase in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): An integrative review / J.H.B. Silva et al. Scientific Electronic Archives. 2023. Vol. 16(12). DOI: 10.36560/161220231816. 14. QTL mapping for pod quality and yield traits in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) / S.N. Njau et al. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024. 15. 1422957. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1422957.
15. Characterization of Western Himalayan small-seeded red beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for yield, quality and resilience / P.A. Sofi et al. Plant Genetic Resources. 2022. Vol. 20(5). P. 337–347. DOI: 10.1017/S1479262123000230.
16. Agrobiological assessment of green bean varieties by adaptability, productivity, and nitrogen fixation / V. Yatsenko et al. Scientific Horizons. 2023. Vol. 26(7). P. 79–94. DOI: 10.48077/scihor7.2023.79.
17. Physiological and yield responses of greenshelled beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under restricted irrigation / K. Campos et al. Agronomy. 2021. Vol. 11. Art. 562. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11030562.
18. Effectiveness of the application of biostimulants in snap bean under water stress / K.I. Hernández-Figueroa et al. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 149–160. DOI: 10.29312/ remexca.v13i28.3270.
19. Abebe A., Tsige A., Work M., Enyew A. Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount on yield and water productivity of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in NW Amhara, Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2020. Vol. 6. Art. 1773690. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1773690.
20. Dhakal R., Bhardwaj H. Alternative Use of Black and Navy Beans as Green Shell Beans. HortScience. 2024. 59(6). P. 831–832. DOI: 10.21273/ HORTSCI17827-24.
21. Growth, phenology and yield response of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to various sowing dates and nutrient sources in Bauchi State, Nigeria / R.A. Bala et al. Journal of Horticultural Science and Research. 2022. Vol. 5(1). P. 200–208. URL: https:// scholars.direct/Articles/horticulture/jhsr-5-026.pdf.
22. Geleta R.J., Roro A.G., Terfa M.T. Phenotypic and yield responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to different soil moisture levels. BMC Plant Biology. 2024. Vol. 24. Art. 242. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-04856-5.
23. ДСТУ ЕЭК ООН FFV-06:2007. Квасоля. Настанови щодо постачання і контролювання якості. Національний стандарт України. Київ: ДП «УкрНДНЦ», 2007. 24 с.
24. ДСТУ 4138–2002. Насіння сільськогосподарських культур. Методи визначення якості. Київ: Держстандарт України, 2003. 173 с.
25. Методика дослідної справи в овочівництві і баштанництві / за ред. Г.Л. Бондаренка, К.І. Яковенка. Харків: Основа, 2001, 369 с.
26. Estimating phenotypic stability for relevant yield and quality traits in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using AMMI analysis / K. Pramanik et al. Heliyon. 2024. 10(5). e26918. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26918
27. Oliveira R.L., Muniz J.A., Andrade M.J.B., Reis R.L. Precisão experimental em ensaios com a cultura do feijão. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 113–119.
28. Porcher M.H. Introducing flageolet beans. Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database. 2005. The University of Melbourne. URL:
https://www. plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Flageolet.html.
29. Diversity and conservation of wild and primitive common bean germplasm and their associated rhizobia in the Andean region / A.M. Ron et al. Legumes for Global Food Security. Nova Science Publishers, 2017.
30. Redden R.J., Delacy I.H., Butler D.G., Usher T. Analysis of line × environment interactions for yield in navy beans. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2000. Vol. 51(5). P. 607–617.
31. Girgel Ü. System-specific determinants of seed yield in common bean: Insights from conventional and organic path analyses. Legume Research – An International Journal. 2025. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.18805/LRF-893.
32. Faria L.C., Del Peloso M.J., Melo L.C. Potencial de rendimento da cultura do feijoeiro comum; base genética da produtividade de grãos do feijoeiro comum no Brasil e no mundo. Santo Antônio de Goiás: EMBRAPA, 2005. P. 64–65.
33. Herança dos teores de fibra alimentar e rendimento de grãos em populações de feijoeiro / P.M.G. Londero et al. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2006. Vol. 41(1). P. 51–58.
34. Backes R.L., Tavares E., Hemp S., Nicknich W. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos de feijoeiro no estado de Santa Catarina. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 2005. Vol. 27(2). P. 309–314.
35. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de produção da cultivar BRS Supremo em diferentes regiões brasileiras / L.C. Melo et al. Comunicado Técnico. 2005. No 104. 4 p.
36. The nutritional content of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in comparison to modern varieties / T. Celmeli et al. Agronomy. 2018. Vol. 8(9). Art. 166. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8090166.