You are here
The influence of genotype and conditions of the year on the inheritance of productive bushiness at hybridization of soft winter wheat cultivars that differ in early maturation
The peculiarities of inheritance of productive bushes in F1, obtained by cross-breeding of different cultivars of soft winter wheat were studied in the conditions of the experimental feld of the Research and Production center of the Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University in 2018–2020 contrasting in the hydrothermal conditions. During the research years, the productive bushiness of selected parental forms for hybridization had a signifcant differentiation of 1.1–2.2 pieces of stem/plant. The varieties formed maximum average productive bushiness (1.7 pcs. stalk/plant) in 2020, and in 2018–2019 the indicator was at the level of 1.5 pcs. stalk/plant. Research has shown that winter wheat productive bushiness is a genetically controlled trait and is highly susceptible to the conditions of the year. The vast majority of hybrids produced in 2018– 2020 signifcantly exceeded the original forms for productive bushing (2.3–7.6 pcs. stalk/plant). The maximum F1 index (4.7 pcs. stalk/plant) was formed in 2019. Under 2018 conditions, the productive bushiness represented 4.1 pcs. In 2018 conditions, the productive bushiness represented 4.1 pcs. stalk/ plant. The minimum productive bushes of 2.8 pcs. stalk/ plant in the hybrid crop were formed in 2020. The results show that the productive bushiness F1 depends on the components of hybridization and the conditions of the year. Positive hypothetical and true heterosis for three years are determined in 34 and 32 of 36 combinations of hybridization, respectively. Stable high hypothetical (307.7–105.4 %) and true (278.6–100.0 %) heterosis, for 2018–2020, was in Bilotserkivska semi-dwarf / Zolotokolosa, Bilotserkivska semi-dwarf / Chornyava, Bilotserkivska semi-dwarf / Vidrada, Zolotokolosa / Chornyava, Zolotokolosa / Vidrada. Studies have found that positive overdominance is the most common type of inheritance of productive bushiness in 2018–2020 observed in 95.1 % of hybrids. However, indicators of phenotypic dominance of productive bushiness in the research years are determined by selected components of hybridization and the conditions of the year. The experimental data indicate that the crossbreeding of soft winter wheat varieties that differ in early maturity of parental forms of made it possible to isolate hybrids, which in contrasting hydrothermal conditions for the growing season years have formed stable high manifestations of productive bushiness.
Key words: soft winter wheat, parental forms, hybrids, productive bushiness, hypothetical and true heterosis, degree of phenotypic dominance, type of inheritance.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6078-3209Reference:
1. Egamov, I.U. (2021). Creation of high-yielding winter wheat varieties with high yield and grain quality suitable for irrigated conditions. International journal of modern agriculture. Vol. 10(2), рр. 2491–2506.
2. Jaskulska, I., Jaskulski, D., Gałęzewski, L., Knapowski, T., Kozera, W., Wacławowicz, R. (2018). Mineral composition and baking value of the winter wheat grain under varied environmental and agronomic conditions. J. Chem. no. 1, рр. 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5013825
3. Din, K., Khan, N.U., Gul, S., Khan, S.U., Khalil, I.H., Khan, S.A., Khalil, I.A. (2021). Line by tester combining ability analysis for earliness and yield traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Japs: Journal of animal & plant sciences. no. 31 (2). DOI: 10.36899/ JAPS.2021.2.0242.
4. Gilliham, M., Able, J.A., Roy, S.J. (2017). Translating know ledge about abiotic stress tolerance to breeding programmers. Plant Journal. Vol. 90, Issue 5, рр. 898–917. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13456.
5. Boichuk, I.V. (2020). Obgruntuvannia pidboru sortiv pshenytsi ozymoi dlia umov pivdennoho stepu Ukrainy [Substantiation of selection of winter wheat varieties for the conditions of the southern steppe of Ukraine]. Topical issues of the development of modern science: The 7th International scientifc and practical conference. Sofa, Bulgaria, ACCENT, рр. 151–161.
6. Lytvynenko, M.A. (2010). Realizatsiia henetychnoho potentsialu. Problemy produktyvnosti ta yakosti zerna suchasnykh sortiv ozymoi pshenytsi [Realization of genetic potential. Problems of productivity and quality of grain of modern varieties of winter wheat]. Nasinnytstvo [Seed production], no. 6, рр. 1–6.
7. Harkness, C., Semenov, M.A., Areal, F. (2020). Adverse weather conditions for UK wheat production under climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 1078622, рр. 282–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107862
8. Domaratskyi, Ye.O. (2018). Podolannia vplyvu stresovykh yavyshch pid chas vyroshchuvannia pshenytsi ozymoi za umov hlobalnykh klimatychnykh zmin [Overcoming the effects of stress during the cultivation of winter wheat in the context of global climate change]. Klimatychni zminy ta silske hospodarstvo. Vyklyky dlia ahrarnoi osvity ta nauky: zb. tez mizhnarodna nauk.-praktych. konf. za uchastiu FAO [Climate change and agriculture. Challenges for agricultural education and science: coll. thesis international scientifc-practical. conf. with the participation of FAO]. Kyiv, рр. 227–232.
9. Nekrasova, О., Kravchenko, N., Marchenko, D., Nekrasov, E. (2021). Estimation of grain productivity and biochemical indicators of the winter bread wheat varieties depending on the forecrop. In E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 273, 01027 р.
10. Khomenko, L.O., Sandetska, N.V. (2018). Dzherela kompleksnoi stiikosti pshenytsi ozymoi (Triticum aestivum L.) u selektsii na adaptyvnist [Sources of complex resistance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in adaptability selection]. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. no. 14(3), pp. 270–276. DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.3.2018.145289.
11. Klčová, L., Ondreičková, K., Mihálik, D., Gubišová, M. (2019). The choice of suitable conditions for wheat genetic transformation. Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo). no. 65(1), рр. 30–36. DOI: 10.2478/ agri-2019-0003
12. Juraev, D.T., Amanov, O.A., Dilmurodov, S.D., Meyliev, A.K., Boysunov, N.B., Kayumov, N.S., Ugli Ergashev, Z.B. (2021). Heritability of valuable economic traits in the hybrid generations of bread wheat. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. рр. 2008–2019.
13. Lozinskyi, M.V. (2016). Inheritance and grain weight transgressive variability per plant in hybrid winter wheat (T. aestivum L.), obtained from the hybridization of various ecotypes. Ahrobiolohiia [Agrobiology], no. 1, рр. 22–28.
14. Bakumenko, O.M., Vlasenko, V.A. (2015). Heterozys ta uspadkuvannia masy 1000 nasinyn v F 1 pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi (Triticum aestivum L.) [Heterosis and inheritance of 1000 seeds in F1 of soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Journal of Native and Alien Plant Studies, no. 11, pp. 67–73. DOI: 10.37555/.11.2015.190866
15. Burdeniuk-Tarasevych, L.A., Lozinskyi, M.V. (2015). Pryntsypy pidboru par dlia hibrydyzatsii v selektsii ozymoi pshenytsi T. aestivum L. na adaptyvnist do umov dovkillia [Principles of selection of pairs for hybridization in the selection of winter wheat T. aestivum L. for adaptability to environmental conditions]. Faktory eksperymentalnoi evoliutsii orhanizmiv [Factors of experimental evolution of organisms], no. 16, рр. 92–96.
16. Shcherbakova, Y.U. (2021). Inheritance of economically valuable characteristics in inter various hybrids of wheat in soft winter under forest steppe. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. Vol. 55(2), рр. 16–20.
17. Diordiieva, I., Riabovol, I., Riabovol, L., Serzhuk, O., Novak, Z., Cherno, O., Karychkovska, S. (2020). Triticale breeding improvement by the intraspecifc and remote hybridization. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, no. 10(4), pp. 67–71. DOI: 10.15421/2020_169.
18. Sootaher, J.K., Abro, T.F., Soomro, Z.A., Soothar, M.K., Baloch, T.A., Menghwar, K.K., Kachi, M., Mastoi, M.A., Soomro, T.A. (2020). Assessment of genetic variability and heritability for grain yield and its associated traits in F 2 populations of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pure and Applied Biology. no. 9(1), pp. 36–45.
19. Sabit, Z., Yadav, D.B., Rai, D.P.K. (2017). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and its components in F5 generation of bread wheat (T. aestivum L.). J. Pharm. Phytochem. no. 6(4), pp. 680–687.
20. Hama-Amin, T.N., Towfq, S.I. (2019). Estimation of some genetic parameters using line × tester analysis of common wheat (T. aestivum L.). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. no. 17(4), pp. 9735–9752.
21. Tang, H., Liu, H., Zhou, Y., Liu, H., Du, L., Wang, K., Ye, X. (2021). Fertility recovery of wheat male sterility controlled by Ms2 using CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnology Journal. no. 19(2), 224 p.
22. Nosatovskyi, A.Y. (1965). Pshenytsa [Wheat]. Мoscow, 568 p.
23. Lykhochvor, V.V., Prots, R.R. (2006). Ozyma pshenytsia [Winter wheat]. Lviv, Ukrainian Technologies Research and Production Enterprise, 216 p.
24. Lozinskyi, M.V. (2013). Zahalna ta produktyvna kushchystist pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi ta yikh vplyv na formuvannia kilkosti zeren i masy zerna z roslyny [General and productive bushiness of soft winter wheat and their influence on the formation of the number of grains and grain weight of the plant]. Naukovi poshuky molodi u tret'omu tysjacholitti: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. molodyh vchenyh, aspirantiv ta doktorantiv [Scientifc research of young people in the third millennium: materials of the international scientifc-practical conference of young scientists, graduate students and doctoral students]. Bila Tserkva, 18 р.
25. Korkhova, M., Kovalenko, O., Khonenko, L., Markova, N. (2018). Productivity of soft winter wheat sort depending on terms length of sowing and weather in spring-summer period. Agrobiology, no. 1, pp. 5–10.
26. Novak, Z.M., Kotsiuba, S.P., Makarchuk, M.O. (2021). Vysota roslyn ta kilkist produktyvnykh stebel hibrydnykh populiatsii F3 pshenytsi tverdoi yaroi [Plant height and number of productive stems of hybrid populations of F3 durum wheat]. Selektsiino-henetychna nauka i osvita: materialy X mizhnar. nauk. konf. [Breeding and genetic science and education: materials of the X International. Science. conf.]. Uman, рр. 164–167.
27. Burdeniuk-Tarasevych, L.A., Lozinskyi, M.V., Dubova, O.A. (2013). Kushchystist pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi riznoho ekoloho-heohrafchnoho pokhodzhennia ta yii zviazok z elementamy produktyvnosti [Bushness of soft winter wheat of different ecological and geographical origin and its connection with the elements of productivity]. Ahrobiolohiia [Agrobiology], no. 10, pp. 142–147.
28. Volkodav, V.V. (2003). Metodyka derzhavnoho vyprobuvannia sortiv roslyn na prydatnist do poshyrennia v Ukraini. Okhorona prav na sorty roslyn [Methods of state testing of plant varieties for suitability for distribution in Ukraine. Protection of plant variety rights]. Kyiv, Alefa, Issue 1, Part 3, 106 p.
29. Dospehov, B.A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyita [Field experiment technique]. Moscow, Agropromizdat, 352 p.
30. Matzinger, D.F., Mannand, T.J., Cockerham, C.C. (1962). Diallel cross in Nicotiana tabacum. Crop Science. no. 2, pp. 238–286.
31. Fonseca, S., Patterson, F.L. (1968). Hybrid vigor in a seven parent diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Science. no. 1, pp. 85–88.
32. Grifng, B. (1950). Analysis of quantitative gene-action by constant parent regression and related techniques. Genetics. no. 35, pp. 303–321.
33. Beil, G.M., Atkins R.E. (1965). Inheritance of quantitative characters in grain sorghum. Iowa State Journal. no. 39, 3.
34. Lozinskyi, M.V., Ustynova, H.L. (2021). Otsinka sortiv pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi za fenotypovoiu i henotypovoiu minlyvistiu produktyvnoi kushchystosti [Evaluation of soft winter wheat varieties by phenotypic and genotypic variability of productive bushiness]. The XII International Sciece Conference «Current issues, achievements and prospects of Science and education». Greece, Athens, pp. 18–20.
35. Lozinskyi, M.V., Burdeniuk-Tarasevych, L.A. (2018). Vplyv hidrotermichnykh umov na formuvannia produktyvnoi kushchystosti T. аestivum L. ozymoi za hibrydyzatsii riznykh ekotypiv [Influence of hydrothermal conditions on the formation of productive bushiness of T. aestivum L. winter hybridization of different ecotypes]. Suchasni problemy vedennja sil's'kogo gospodarstva ta pidgotovky fahivciv agrarnogo proflju: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf [Modern problems of agriculture and training of agricultural specialists: materials of the international scientifc-practical conference]. Bila Tserkva, рр. 17–18.
36. Khomenko, S., Fedorenko, M., Chugunkova, T. (2021). Inheritance of Yield Components and Heterosis in Spring Durum Wheat Hybrids (Triticum durum Desf.). Cytol Genet. Vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 309–316. DOI: 10.3103/S0095452721040058
37. Lozinskyi, M.V. (2015). Uspadkuvannia i transhresyvna minlyvist zahalnoi i produktyvnoi kushchystosti vnutrishnovydovykh hibrydiv pshenytsi ozymoi [Inheritance and transgressive variability of general and productive bushiness of intraspecifc hybrids of winter wheat]. Ahrobiolohiia [Agrobiology], no. 2, pp. 53–56.
38. Maich, R.H., Steffolani, M.E., Di Rienzo, J.A., León, A.E. (2017). Association between grain yield, grain quality and morpho-physiological traits along ten cycles of recurrent selection in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res. Com. no. 45(1), pp. 146–153.
39. Dubovyk, N.S., Humeniuk, O.V., Kyrylenko, V.V., Misiura, I.I., Khomenko, T.M. (2019). Inheritance of ear productivity elements in hybrids of F1 Triticum aestivum L., created with the participation of varieties of carriers of wheat-rye translocations 1AL. 1RS and 1BL. 1RS. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. no. 15(1), pp. 5–12.
Download this article:
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 lozinskiy_2022-1-95-106.pdf | 521.23 KB |
YEAR: