You are here

Evaluation of durum winter wheat varieties by growth and development indicators

The article presents the study results of the formation of growth and development indicators (growing season length of plants, plant height, density dynamics, ear parameters and grain yield) of domestic varieties of durum winter wheat. It is analyzed that the level of the signs manifestation varies signifcantly depending on the weather conditions of the growing season. However, the growing season duration hardly depend on weather conditions and is 268–269 days. In the full ripeness stage, the height of plants increased 1.4–1.8 times in comparison with earing with insignifcant variation (V=1–5 %) depending on the variety. The lowest plants were Athena, Continent and Laguna – 71–76 cm. Uneven precipitation distribution and high air temperature in 2013 contributed to the formation of fewer stems of durum winter wheat plants compared to more favourable 2014. In the full ripeness stage of durum winter wheat grain in 2013, the coefcient of total tillering was 1.01–1.26 depending on the variety. In 2014, the stem density was the highest. In the full ripeness stage of grain, the number of stems ranged from 650 to 812 pcs/m2 depending on the variety with a total tillering rate of 1.54–1.91. It should be noted that Athena and Linkor varieties retained a higher ability to tillering and stem survival in different weather conditions. The ear length of winter durum wheat varied from 5.9 to 6.7 cm depending on the variety with slight and small variation (V=3–16 %). The number of spikelets in the ear was from 16 to 20 pcs with a small variation coefcient. The ear length of durum winter wheat varied most. Thus, of the nine varieties, the variation coefcient of this indicator in six varieties was average, and in the rest of them - small. However, there was no signifcant difference between the varieties. The highest yields were formed by Argonaut, Gardemaryn and Linkor varieties – 6.00–6.31 t/ha or 13–19 % more than the standard. Grain yield varied signifcantly depending on the weather conditions of the growing season, which is also evidenced by the stability index and was below 1 (0.48–0.64). Less favourable weather conditions in 2013 provided the yield of 3.74–4.63 t/ha depending on the variety. More favourable weather conditions in 2014 provided the grain yield of 5.46–8.25 t/ha depending on durum winter wheat variety. It is obvious that the positive effect of weather conditions in 2014 on tillering and stem survival of winter durum wheat determined the formation of higher grain yield.

Key words: durum winter wheat, variety, growth and development indicators, yield.

 

Reference: 
1. EUROSTAT. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/data/database
2. Kadkol, G., Sissons, M. (2018). Durum wheat: overview. Encyclopedia of Food Grains. Oxford, Academic Press. pp. 117–124 3. Xynias, I.N., Mylonas, I., Korpetis, E.G., Ninou, E., Tsaballa, A., Avdikos, I.D., Mavromatis, A.G. (2020). Durum wheat breeding in the mediterranean region: current status and future prospects. Agronomy. Vol. 10, рр. 1–27.
4. Chairi, F., Vergara-Diaz, O., Vatter, T., Aparicio, N., Nieto-Taladriz, M.T., Kefauver, S.C., Bort, J., Serret, M.D., Araus, J.L. (2018). Post-Green revolution genetic advance in durum wheat: the case of Spain. Field Crop. Res. рр. 158– 169.
5. Scherf, K.A. (2019). Immunoreactive cereal proteins in wheat allergy, non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGS) and celiac disease. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. Vol. 25, рр. 35–41.
6. Soriano, J.M., Villegas, D., Sorrells, M.E., Royo, C. (2018). Durum wheat landraces from east and west regions of the mediterranean basin are genetically distinct for yield components and phenology. Front. Plant Sci. Vol. 9, рр. 80–95.
7. Hospodarenko, G.M., Kostogryz, V.P., Liubych, V.V. (2016). Pshenycja spel'ta [Wheat spelt]. Kyiv, SIK GROUP UKRAINE, 312 р.
8. Dura, S., Duwayri, M., Nachit, M., Sheyaboudi, F.A. (2013). Detection of molecular markers associated with yield and yield components in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum Desf.) under drought conditions. Crop Pasture Sci. Vol. 64, рр. 957–964.
9. Giuliani, M.M. De Santis, M.A., Pompa, M., Giuzio, I., Flagella, Z. (2014). Analysis of gluten proteins composition during grain flling in two durum wheat cultivars submitted to two water regoms. Ital. J. Agron. Vol. 90, рр. 15–19.
10. Liubych, V.V. (2017). Vplyv abiotychnyh ta biotychnyh chynnykiv na produktyvnist' sortiv i linij pshenyci spel'ty [The influence of abiotic and biotic factors on the productivity of varieties and spelled wheat lines]. Visny`k Poltavs`koyi DAA [Bulletin of Poltava SAA], no. 3, рр. 18–24.
11. Liubych, V.V. (2017). Produktyvnist' sortiv i linij pshenyc' zalezhno vid abiotychnyh i biotychnyh chynnykiv [Productivity of varieties and lines of wheat depending on abiotic and biotic factors]. Visny`k agrarnoyi nauky` Pry`chornomor'ya [Ukrainian Black Sea region agrarian science]. Issue 95, рр. 46–161.
12. Entz, M.H., Kirk, A.P., Carkner, M., Vaisman, I., Fox, S.L. (2018). Evaluation of lines from a farmer participatory organic wheat breeding program. Crop Sci. Vol. 58, рр. 243–255.
13. Farag, H.I.A. (2013). Efciency of three methods of selection in wheat breeding under saline stress conditions. Egypt. J. Plant Breed. Vol. 17, рр. 85–95.
14. Boudersa, N., Ghania, C., Aicha, A., Cherfa, R. (2021). Assessment of biological and agronomic diversity of seven durum wheat varieties cultivated in the Northeastern region of Algeria. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. Vol. 22, no. 2, рр. 220–259.
15. Bassi, F.M., Nachit, M.M. (2019). Genetic gain for yield and allelic diversity over 35 years of durum wheat breeding at ICARDA. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. Vol. 1, рр. 10–19.
16. Kalenska, S.M., Shutyi, O.I. (2016). Formuvannia produktyvnosti ta yakosti pshenytsi tverdoi yaroi zalezhno vid mineralnoho zhyvlennia u Pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrainy [Formation of productivity and quality of durum spring wheat depending on mineral nutrition in the RightBank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Visny`k Poltavs`koyi DAA [Bulletin of Poltava SAA], no. 3, рр. 19–24.
17. Yula, V.M., Drozd, M.O. (2015). Vplyv pohodnykh umov ta udobrennia na produktyvnist pshenytsi tverdoi yaroi v pivnichnii chastyni Lisostepu [Influence of weather conditions and fertilizers on the productivity of spring durum wheat in the northern part of the Forest-Steppe]. Visny`k agrarnoyi nauky [Bulletin of agrarian science], no. 2, pp. 23–27.
18. Sivakumar, S., Matthew, P.R., Sansaloni, C. (2018). Genome-Wide association analyses identify QTL hotspots for yield and component traits in durum wheat grown under yield potential, drought, and heat stress environments. Front. Plant Sci. Vol. 8, рр. 18–29.
19. Sehgal, D., Vikram, P., Sansaloni, C.P., Ortiz, C., Pierre, C.S., Payne, T., Ellis, M., Amri, A., Petroli, C.D., Wenzl, P. (2015). Exploring and mobilizing the gene bank biodiversity for wheat improvement. PLoS ONE. Vol. 10, рр. 154–169.
20. Abu-Zaitoun, S.Y., Chandrasekhar, K., Assili, S., Shtaya, M.J., Jamous, R.M., Mallah, O.B., Nashef, K., Sela, H., Distelfeld, A., Alhajaj, N. (2018). Unlocking the genetic diversity within a Middle-East panel of durum wheat landraces for adaptation to semi-arid climate. Agronomy. Vol. 8, рр. 1–12.
21. Babay, E., Mnasri, S.R., Mzid, R., Naceur, M.B., Hanana, M. (2019). Quality selection and genetic diversity of tunisian durum wheat varieties using SSR markers. Biosci. J. рр. 1002–1012.
22. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Area, Yield, and Production of Canadian Principal Field Crops Report. Available at: https://aimis-simia.agr.gc.ca/rp/index-eng. cfm?action=pR&r=243〈=EN

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon lubich_poluanecka_1_2021.pdf439.12 KB