You are here

Bioenergy efficiency of some elements of sugar beets growing technology

 

The goal of the research is to assess the bioenergy efficiency of individual elements of sugar beet growing technology.
Materials and methods. The experiment was conducted at the Training and Production Center (BCC) of Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University in 2015-2017. All field experiments were conduct on the background of the main fertilizer. Under the basic cultivation of the soil 40 t/h of manure and N120P100K140 mineral fertilizers (a.s.) were introduced, on the basis of the planned yield of 70 t/ha. Norms of organic and mineral fertilizers were calculated taking into account the presence of nutrients in the soil and the coefficient of their removal by sugar beet.
The results of research. For the energy assessment of the elements of sugar beet cultivation technology in the central part of the Right-bank Forest-steppe zone of Ukraine, the cost of the total energy per unit area was determined by the technological maps, which were grouped and analyzed according to the following articles: seeds, fertilizers, fuels and lubricants, mechanized and manual work, and etc. The energy efficiency was determined by the energy efficiency ratio (Cee) – the ratio of the difference between the reproduced energy (energy consumption of the crop) and the consumed energy efficiency coefficient where the seed with the laboratory similarity was sown more than 95 % – (Cee = 5.51). When used for sowing seeds with a laboratory similarity of more than 91–95 %, the energy efficiency was slightly lower than that of sowing seeds more than 95 % and was 5.42.
With the increasing of plant density to harvesting from 80–90 to 101–110 thousand/ha, the energy output from the harvest increased from 829521 to 905520 MJ, but due to higher yields in variants where the plant density was 101-110 thousand/ha of energy, comparatively before control was higher. The energy efficiency ratio tended to decrease both for the use of hybrids and for the introduction of trace elements in the feed and amounted to 5.57–6.08.
Conclusions. It is proved that the developed agrotechnological measures for sugar beet cultivation in the line hybrid – the quality of the seeds – the plant stomatal density – fertilizers – the duration of the vegetation period, provide a high economic effect.
The formation of optimal sugar beet seeding on the area provided the highest yield of energy with the yield on variants with double application of microfertilizers in the non-root nutrition.
Key words: sugar beets, bioenergy efficiency, similarity of sown seeds, plant density, varietal composition, foliar nutrition, duration of vegetation period.

 

Reference: 
1. Karpuk, L.M. (2013). Produktyvnist' gibrydiv zalezhno vid biologichnyh form cukrovyh burjakiv [Productivity of hybrids depending on the biological forms of sugar beet]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Instytutu bioenergetychnyh kul'tur i cukrovyh burjakiv NAAN Ukrai'ny [Collection of scientific works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet NAAS of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Issue 17, Vol. 1, pp. 140–145.
2. Karpuk, L.M. (2013). Vlijanie srokov uborki na produktivnost' biologicheskih form saharnoj svekly [The effect of harvest time on the productivity of biological forms of sugar beet]. Saharnaja svekla [Sugar beet], no. 8, pp. 45–48.
3. Karpuk, L.M. (2013). Produktivnost' saharnoj svekly v zavisimosti ot agrotehnicheskih priemov vyrashhivanija [The productivity of sugar beet, depending on the agrotechnical methods of cultivation]. Zemledelie i zashhita rastenij [Agriculture and Plant Protection], no. 6, pp. 62-63.
4. Doronin, V.A., Byelyk, Ya.V., Polishchuk, V.V., Karpuk, L.M. (2014). The quality of sugar beet seed and the ways of its increase. Ecological consequences of increasing crop productivity: plant breeding and biotic diversity. Саnada, pp. 175–190.
5. Doronin, V.A., Karpuk, L.M. (2015). Sugar Beet Productivity Formation Depending on Foliar Application of Microelements. Biological systems, biodiversity and stability of plant communities. Toronto. New jersey. Apple Academic Press., pp. 175–191.
6. Karpuk, L.M., Vahnij, S.P., Krykunova, O.V., Kykalo, M.M., Polishhuk, V.V. (2015). Produktyvnist' burjakiv cukrovyh zalezhno vid gidrotermichnyh umov vegetacijnogo periodu [Productivity of beet sugar depending on hydrothermal conditions of the growing season]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' “Agrobiologija” [Collection of scientific works "Agrobiology"]. Bila Tserkva, Issue 2 (121), pp. 23–28.
7. Karpuk, L., Vachniy, S., Krykunova, O., Pavlichenko, A. (2016). Quality of sugar beet seeds and the ways of its increase. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' “Agrobiologija” [Collection of scientific works "Agrobiology"]. Bila Tserkva, Issue (128), pp. 52–62.
8. Karpuk, L.M., Vahnij, S.P., Krykunova, O.V., Karaul'na, V.M., Bogatyr, L.V., Pavlichenko, A.A. (2018). Produktyvnist' posiviv burjakiv cukrovyh zalezhno vid genotypu [Productivity of sugar beet crops depending on genotype]. Tavrijs'kyj naukovyj visnyk: Naukovyj zhurnal [Taurian Scientific Journal: Scientific Journal.]. Kherson, Gel'vetyka, Issue 100, Vol. 1, pp. 81–87.
9. Doronin, V.A., Dryha, V.V., Karpuk, L.M., Vachniy, S.P., Pavlichenko, A.A., Mykolayko, V.P., Polischuk, V.V. (2018). Specific aspects of the formation of Miscanthus planting material depending on cultivation conditions. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences. Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 325–331.
10. Medvydovc'kyj, O.K., Ivanenko, P.I. (1988). Energetychnyj analiz intencyvnyh tehnologij v cil'c'kogocpodarc'komu vyrobnyctvi [Energy analysis of intechnical technologies in the field of industrial augmentation]. Kyiv, Urozhaj, 205 p.
11. Tarariko, Ju.O., Nesmashna, O.Je., Glushhenko, L.D. (2001). Energetychna ocinka system zemlerobstva i tehnologij vyroshhuvannja sil's'kogospodars'kyh kul'tur [Energy assessment of agricultural systems and technologies for growing crops]. Kyiv, Nora-print, 60 p.
12. Shamsutdinova, A.V. (2016). Produktyvnist' ta ekonomichna efektyvnist' vyroshhuvannja cukrovyh burjakiv zalezhno vid pozakorenevogo pidzhyvlennja mikrodobryvamy [Productivity and economic efficiency of sugar beet cultivation depending on foliar fertilization by microfertilizers]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrai'ny [Scientific reports of NUBiP of Ukraine], no. 5. Available at: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view-/7240.
13. Shpychak, O.M., Gapusenko, Ju.Ja. (2006). Normatyvni vytraty, ciny, balansy sil's'kogospodars'koi' produkcii' i Ukrai'ni ta krai'nah svitu [Normative costs, prices, balances of agricultural products to Ukraine and countries of the world]. Kyiv, NNC "IAE", 693 p.
14. Marsanov, V.V. (2002). Jelementy teorii upravlencheskih reshenij [Elements of the theory of management decisions]. Kherson, Ajlant, 71 p.
15. Mironova, N.M. (2006). Naprjamki znizhennja ta shljahi vdoskonalennja strukturi virobnichih vitrat [Directions of reduction and ways to improve the structure of production costs]. Tavrіjs'kij naukovij vіsnik [Taurian Scientific Bulletin.], Issue 44, pp. 326–333.
16. Bazarov, E.I., Glinka, E.V. (1983). Metodika biojenergeticheskoj ocenki tehnologij proizvodstva produkcii rastenievodstva [Methods of bioenergy assessment of crop production technologies]. Moscow, 43 p.
17. Busygin, N.G. (2006). Progressivnye metody organizacii resurso-obespechenija sel'skih tovaroproizvoditelej [Progressive methods of organizing the resource provision of rural producers]. Moscow, Rosagrosnab, 6 p.
18. Jarchuk, I.I. (2001). Energetychna ocinka okremyh elementiv vyroshhuvannja sil's'kogospodars'kyh kul'tur [Energy assessment of individual elements of cultivating crops]. Zb. nauk. pr. In-tu zemlerobstva UAAN [Collection of scientific works of Institute of Agriculture NAAS].  Kyiv, Issue 1/2,  pp. 102–105.
 
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon karpuk-agro-1-2019.pdf214.15 KB