1. Erofeeva E.A. Hormetic effects of abiotic environmental stressors in woody plants in the context of climate change. Journal of Forestry Research. 2023. Vol. 34. P. 7–19.
3. Jarecki W., Migut D. Comparison of yield and important seed quality traits of selected legume species. Agronomy. 2022. Vol. 12. 2667. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12112667
4. Prusiński J. Cultivation, origin and use of grain legume cultivars in Poland. Polish Journal of Agronomy. 2020. Vol. 41. P. 20–28.
5. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria eliminate the effect of drought stress in plants: a review / H.M. Ahmad et al. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022. Vol. 13. 875774. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.875774
6. Research progress in soybean by phytohormone modulation and metal chelation over the past decade / S. Shaffique et al. Agriculture. 2023. Vol. 13. No 7. 1325. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13071325
7. Mirshad P.P., Puthur J.T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal association enhances drought tolerance potential of promising bioenergy grass (Saccharum arundinaceum Retz.). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016. Vol. 188. No 7. 425 p. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5428-7
8. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in C3 Leymus chinensis and C4 Hemarthria altissima grasses via altering antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthesis / J. Li et al. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019. Vol. 10. 499 p. DOI: 10.3389/ fpls.2019.00499
9. Soybean yield, biological N2 fixation and seed composition responses to additional inoculation in the United States / W.D. Carciochi et al. Scientific Reports. 2019. Vol. 9. No 1. 19908. DOI: 10.1038/ s41598-019-56465-0
10. Jarecki W. Effect of soybean seed inoculation with symbiotic bacteria. Legume Research – An International Journal. 2024. Vol. 47. No 1. P. 89–94. DOI: 10.18805/LRF-757
11. Igiehon N.O., Babalola O.O., Cheseto X., Torto B. Effects of rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on yield, size distribution and fatty acid of soybean seeds grown under drought stress. Microbiological Research. 2021. Vol. 242. 126640. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126640
12. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium under drought stress / M.S. Sheteiwy et al. BMC Plant Biology. 2021. Vol. 21. 195 p. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02949-z
13. Tripartite microbial augmentation of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens, Bacillus sp. MN54 and Piriformospora indica on growth, yield, and nutrient profiling of soybean (Glycine max L.) / M. Rafique et al. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2025. Vol. 15. 1437489. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437489
14. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture / S. Munemasa et al. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2015. Vol. 28. P. 154–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.10.010
15. The regulatory role of phytohormones in plant drought tolerance / Z. Liao et al. Planta. 2025. Vol. 261. No 5. 98 p. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-025- 04671-8
16. Verma V., Ravindran P., Kumar P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biology. 2016. Vol. 16. 86 p. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y
17. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator / M. Hasanuzzaman et al. Antioxidants. 2020. Vol. 9. No 8. 681 p. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9080681
18. Чайка Т.О., Короткова І.В. Фізико-хімічні аспекти впливу біопрепаратів на вміст абсцизової кислоти в умовах гідротермічного стресу у сої (Glycine max L. Merr.): інтеграція біохімічних та агрономічних маркерів адаптації. Агробіологія. 2025. № 2. С. 233–245. DOI: 10.33245/2310-9270-2025-199-2-233-245
19. Чайка Т.О., Короткова І.В. Вплив передпосівної обробки насіння сої біопрепаратами на вміст фотосинтетичних пігментів і врожайність за умов нестійкого зволоження й органічного землеробства. Агробіологія. 2025. № 1. С. 188–198. DOI: 10.33245/2310-9270-2025-195-1-188-198
20. Koval I.M., Bräuning A. The effect of climate change on the radial growth of Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus robur L. in the stands of Kharkiv green zone. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology. 2024. No 41. P. 130–142. DOI: 10.26565/1992-4224-2024-41-10
21. Chaika T., Lotysh I. The effect of biopreparations on the adaptive properties of soybean in organic farming under hydrothermal stress. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science. 2025. Vol. 29. No 2. P. 34–49. DOI: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2025.34
22. Patanè C., Cosentino S.L., Romano D., Toscano S. Relative water content, proline and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of long shelf-life tomatoes under drought stress and rewatering. Plants. 2022. Vol. 11. 3045. DOI: 10.3390/plants11223045
23. Interference-free determination of abscisic acid and gibberellin in plant samples using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence based on oxidation derivatization coupled with second-order calibration methods / Y.-N. Li et al. Analytical Methods. 2009. Vol. 1. P. 115–122. DOI: 10.1039/ B9AY00048H
24. Assessing morpho-physiological and biochemical markers of soybean for drought tolerance potential / M.K. Fatema et al. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. No 2. 1427 p. DOI: 10.3390/su15021427
25. Food energy – methods of analysis and conversion factors. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 77. Rome: FAO, 2003. 97 p.
26. Resilience of soybean cultivars to drought stress during flowering and early-seed setting stages / S. Poudel et al. Scientific Reports. 2023. Vol. 13. No 1. 1277. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28354-0
27. Soybean seed chemical composition as influenced by Bradyrhizobium inoculation in soils with elevated nickel concentrations / O. Stajković-Srbinović et al. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020. Vol. 153. 103576. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103576
28. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis alleviates drought stress in soybean with overexpressing the GmSPL9d gene by promoting photosynthetic apparatus and regulating the antioxidant system / N. Begum et al. Microbiological Research. 2023. Vol. 273. 127398. DOI: 10.1016/j. micres.2023.127398