1. Lysenko, V.I., Nedovizii, Yu.Yu. (2020). Dynamika arealu kabana v Ukraini ta mozhlyvosti upravlinnia yoho chyselnistiu [Dynamics of the Kaban range in Ukraine and the possibility of managing its number]. In The 11th International scientific and practical conference «Eurasian scientific congress». Barca Academy Publishing, Barcelona, Spain. Available at:
http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/ bitstream/123456789/11477/1/EURASIAN-SCIENTIFIC-CONGRESS_1-3.11.20.pdf#page=42
2. Zyma, I.S., Halanin, D.S., Startsev, O.O. (2024). Shliakhy udoskonalennia protsesiv upravlinnia populiatsiiamy khutrovykh zviriv [Ways to improve the processes of management of populations of fur animals]. Haluzi lisovoho hospodarstva: zbirnyk materialiv II Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii do 205-richchia z dnia narodzhennia V.Ie. fon Hraffa [Forestry branches: Collection of materials of the II All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference to the 205th anniversary of the birth of the V.E. von Graff]. Malyn, 85 p.
3. Vlasiuk, V.P. (2020). Osoblyvosti planuvannia chyselnosti osnovnykh vydiv myslyvskykh tvaryn [Features of planning the number of basic species of hunting animals]. Mizhdystsyplinarni naukovi doslidzhennia: osoblyvosti ta tendentsii [Interdisciplinary research: features and trends]. pp. 18–19.
4. Sheihas, I.M. (2021). Kharakterystyka dii limituiuchykh faktoriv na stan myslyvskoho resursu Ukrainy [Characteristics of the action of limiting factors on the state of the hunting resource of Ukraine]. Theriologia Ukrainica. Issue 21, pp. 141–151.
5. Pavlenko, A.V., Lisovyi, M.M., Chaika, V.M. (2016). Reaktsiia populiatsii khyzhykh tvaryn na pryrodookhoronni zakhody [Response of predatory animal populations to conservation measures]. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal [Agroecological journal]. Issue 3, pp. 19–23. DOI: 10.33730/2077- 4893.3.2016.248858
6. Muraviov, Y.V. (2019). Resursy myslyvskykh tvaryn yak peredumova stanovlennia ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku myslyvskoho hospodarstva [Resources of hunting animals as a prerequisite for the formation of ecological and economic development of hunting]. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU. Issue 29(4), pp. 86–88. DOI: 10.15421/40290418
7. Rizun, E. (2017). Oblik myslyvskykh zviriv u myslyvskykh uhiddiakh (ohliad metodyk) [Accounting for game animals in hunting grounds (review of methods)]. Novitates Theriologicae. Parts 10, pp. 121–132. Available at:
http://terioshkola.org.ua/ library/nt10-fieldstudy/nt1017-rizun-huntcensus.pdf
8. Tajchman, K., Czyzowski, P., Drozd, L., Karpinski, M., Wojtas, J. (2018). Sustainable game management as one of the determinants of the welfare of hunting animals. Journal of Animal Science, Biology and Bioeconomy. Issue 36 (1), pp. 19–30. DOI: 10.24326/jasbbx.2018.1.2
9. Fukasawa, K., Osada, Y., Iijima, H. (2020). Is harvest size a valid indirect measure of abundance for evaluating the population size of game animals using 329 agrobiologiya.btsau.edu.ua Агробіологія, 2025, № 1 harvest based estimation? Wildlife Biology. Issue 4, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00708
10. Gée, A., Sarasa, M., Pays, O. (2018). Long– term variation of demographic parameters in four small game species in Europe: opportunities and limits to test for a global pattern. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. Issue 41(1), pp. 33–60. DOI: 10.32800/abc.2018.41.0033.
12. Kawata, Y. (2016). Possibility of improvement in game animal utilization. Int. J. Adv. Agric. Environ. Eng. Issue 3, pp. 40–46. Available at: https:// web.archive.org/web/20180602034540id_/
http://iicbe.org/upload/3000ER0116011.pdf
13. Gallo, T., Pejchar, L. (2016). Improving habitat for game animals has mixed consequences for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation. Issue 197, pp. 47–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.032
14. Lewis, J.S., Spaulding, S., Swanson, H., Keeley, W., Gramza, A. R., VandeWoude, S., Crooks, K.R. (2021). Human activity influences wildlife populations and activity patterns: implications for spatial and temporal refuges. Ecosphere. Issue 12 (5). DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3487
15. Eikelboom, J.A., Wind, J., Van de Ven, E., Kenana, L.M., Schroder, B., De Knegt, H.J., Prins, H.H. (2019). Improving the precision and accuracy of animal population estimates with aerial image object detection. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Issue 10(11), pp. 1875–1887. DOI: 10.1111/2041- 210X.13277
16. Potentsial myslyvskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. Porivniannia obsiahiv dobuvannia dychyny v Yevropi [The potential of hunting economy of Ukraine. Comparison of game production in Europe]. Vseukrainska asotsiatsiia myslyvtsiv ta korystuvachiv myslyvskykh uhid [All–Ukrainian Association of Hunters and Users of Hunting Land]. 2024. Available at:
https://www.uahhg.org.ua/potencial-mislivskogo-gospodarstva-ukra%D1%97ni...
18. Robinson, J.M., Harrison, P.A., Mavoa, S., Breed, M. F. (2022). Existing and emerging uses of drones in restoration ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 13(9), pp. 1899–1911. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13912 19. Carver, S., Convery, I., Hawkins, S., Beyers, R., Eagle, A., Kun, Z., Soulé, M. (2021). Guiding principles for rewilding. Conservation Biology. Vol. 35(6), pp. 1882–1893. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13730
20. Holmes, G., Marriott, K., Briggs, C., Wynne-Jones, S. (2020). What is rewilding, how should it be done, and why? A Q-method study of the views held by European rewilding advocates. Conservation and Society. Vol. 18(2), pp. 77–88. DOI: 10.4103/ cs.cs_19_14
21. Mutillod, C., Buisson, É., Mahy, G., Jaunatre, R., Bullock, J. M., Tatin, L., Dutoit, T. (2024). Ecological restoration and rewilding: two approaches with complementary goals? Biological Reviews. Vol. 99(3), pp. 820–836. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13046
22. Egoh, B.N., Nyelele, C., Holl, K.D., Bullock, J.M., Carver, S., Sandom, C.J. (2021). Rewilding and restoring nature in a changing world. PloS one. Vol. 16(7), e0254249. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0254249
23. Johansson, M., Flykt, A., Frank, J., Hartig, T. (2024). Wildlife and the restorative potential of natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102233