You are here

Головна » 2024 » AGROBIOLOGY №2 2024

Phytosanitary condition of soybean crops under different fungicide protection

The article presents the results of determining the phytosanitary condition of soybean crops under different fungicide protection. The research was conducted in 2021-2023 in the conditions of Savarske LLC, Kyiv region. Experimental design: Factor A. Varieties. «Amadea», «Aurelina». Factor B. Fungicides. Control (treatment of seeds and plants with water), «Maxim Advance 195 FS», «TH» (1.25 l/t) (seed treatment before sowing), «Vaibrans RFC», t.n. (1 l/t) (seed treatment before sowing), «Selest top 312.5 FS», «TH» (1 l/t) (pre-sowing seed treatment), «Standak Top» (2 l/t) (pre-sowing seed treatment), «Abacus» (2 l/ha) (during the growing season), «Maxim Advance 195 FS», «TH» (1. 25 l/t) + «Abacus» (2 l/ha), «Vaibrans RFC», t.n. (1.25 l/t). n. (1 l/t) + «Abacus» (2 l/ha), «Seleste top 312.5 FS», «TH» (1 l/t) + «Abacus» (2 l/ha), «Standak top» (2 l/t) + «Abacus» (2 l/ha). It was found that at the stage of the first pair of true soybean leaves (ВВСН 10-12) in the control plots without fungicides using the most common diseases were alternaria – 34.2 %, ascochyta – 30.2 % and fusarium – 24.5 %. During the flowering period (ВВСН 65), the percentage of fusarium (20.5%) and ascochyta (28.3 %) decreased and the percentage of alternaria (35.7%) increased, while the percentage of Septoria was 3.1% in the first period and 5.4 % in the second period. In the varieties «Amadea» and «Aurelina» at the stage of ВВСН 12 the prevalence of fusarium, alternaria and ascochitosis were on average 2.2 and 2.7%, 3.7 and 3.0% and 2.7 and 2.1%, respectively, and the disease intensity development was 3.8 and 4.0%, 3.1 and 3.6% and 3.1 and 2.2%, respectively. The efficacy of pre-sowing soybean seed treatment with fungicides reduced the development of Fusarium by 83.3–88.9%, Alternaria by 85.5–90.3% and Ascochitosis by 80.2–89.7% on average in the soybean varieties tested. At the ВВСН 65 stage (flowering) in soybean varieties «Amadea» and «Aurelina» the prevalence of fusarium, alternaria and ascochitosis were on average 2.4 and 2.7%, 3.5 and 3.4%, 3.2 and 2.6%. The most effective system for protecting soybean crops against fusarium, alternaria and ascochyta was the combined using of a pre-sowing seed treatment with the fungicides «Maxim Advance 195 FS», «TH» (1.25 l/t), «Vaibrans RFC», t.n. (1 l/t), «Selest Top 312.5 FS», «TN» (1 l/t) and «Standak Top» (2 l/t) and the application of «Abacus» (2 l/ha) during the growing season.

Key words: soybean, variety, fungicides, seed treatment, disease extend, intensity of disease development, preparations efficiency.

 

Mostypan O.


Grabovskiy M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-7896


Pavlichenko K.


Nimenko S.


Ustinova Н. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-358Х


Reference: 
1. Korobko, A.A. (2021). Dinamіka virobnictva soii’ v Ukrai’nі ta svіtі [Dynamics of soybean production in Ukraine and the world]. Zbalansovane prirodokoristuvannja [Balanced nature management]. no. 4, рр. 125–134.
2. Liu, S., Zhang, M., Feng, F., Tian, Z. (2020). Toward a “green revolution” for soybean. Molecular plant. no. 13 (5), рр. 688–697.
3. Rincker, K., Nelson, R., Specht, J., Sleper, D., Cary, T., Cianzio, S.R., Diers, B. (2014). Genetic improvement of US soybean in maturity groups II, III, and IV. Crop science. no. 54 (4), рр. 1419–1432.
4. Voora, V., Bermudez, S., Le, H., Larrea, C., Luna, E. (2024). Soybean prices and sustainability. IISD Market Report. 2024-02. 5. Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Papaevangelou, O. (2022). Role of crop-protection technologies in sustainable agricultural productivity and management. Land. no 11(10), 1680 p.
6. Grabovskyi, M., Mostypan, O., Fedoruk, Y., Kozak, L., Ostrenko, M. (2023). Formation of grain yield and quality indicators of soybeans under the influence of fungicidal protection. Scientific Horizons. no. 26 (2), рр. 66–76.
7. Grabovskyi, M.B., Mostypan, O.V. (2023). Ekonomіchna ocіnka zastosuvannja fungіcidnogo і gerbіcidnogo zahistu sortіv soi' rіznih grup stiglostі [Economic assessment of the use of fungicidal and herbicidal protection of soybean varieties of different maturity groups]. Tavrіjs'kij naukovij vіsnik [Taurian Scientific Herald]. no. 134, рр. 45–53.
8. Fleurat-Lessard, F. (2017). Integrated management of the risks of stored grain spoilage by seedborne fungi and contamination by storage mould mycotoxins–An update. Journal of Stored Products Research. no. 71, рр. 22–40.
9. Vlasenko, V.V. (2012). Suchasnі pogljadi vplivu fіtopatogenіv v agrofіtocenozah pri zagotіvlі ta zberezhennі kormіv [Modern views of the influence of phytopathogens in agrophytocenoses during the harvesting and preservation of fodder]. Kormi і kormovirobnictvo [Fodder and fodder production]. Issue 74, рр. 202–207.
10. Derevyanskyi, V.P. (2007). Poshirennja hvorob ta produktivnіst' soi' [Disease spread and productivity of soybeans]. Karantin і zahist roslin [Quarantine and plant protection]. no. 5, рр. 11–14.
11. Ivanyuk, S.V., Temchenko, I.V. (2006). Ocіnka stіjkostі do osnovnih hvorob sortozrazkіv soi' v umovah Lіsostepu Ukrai’ni [Assessment of resistance to major diseases of soybean cultivars in the conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Kormi і kormovirobnictvo [Fodder and fodder production]. Issue 57, рр. 36–42.
12. Zhitkevich, N.V., Hnatyuk, T.T., Petrychenko, V.F., Patyka, V.P. (2009). Dіagnostika bakterіal'nih patogenіv soi' [Diagnostics of bacterial pathogens of soybeans]. Kormi і kormovirobnictvo [Fodder and fodder production]. no. 64, рр. 62–69.
13. Hvorobi soi’: monіtoring, dіagnostika, zahist: monografіja [Soybean diseases: monitoring, diagnosis, protection]. Vinnytsia, 2016, 106 p.
14. Wang, D., Dowell, F.E., Ram, M.S., Schapaugh, W.T. (2004). Classification of fungal-damaged soybean seeds using near-infrared spectroscopy. International journal of food properties. no. 7 (1), рр. 75–82.
15. Baysal-Gurel, F., Kabir, N. (2018). Comparative performance of fungicides and biocontrol products in suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot in viburnum. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. no. 9 (9), 451 p.
16. Kots, S.Ya., Pavlishche, A.V. (2021). Vikoristannja fungіcidіv u іntegrovanih sistemah zahistu roslin soi’ ta i’h vpliv na fiziologo-biohimichni procesi za іnokuljacіi’ i’i’ nasіnnja bul'bochkovimi bakterijami [The use of fungicides in integrated systems of protection of soybean plants and their effect on physiological and biochemical processes during inoculation of its seeds with nodule bacteria]. Fіzіologіja roslin і genetika [Physiology of plants and genetics]. Vol. 53, no. 1, рр. 3–28.
17. Hanna, S.O., Conley, S.P., Shaner, G.E., Santini, J.B. (2008). Fungicide application timing and row spacing effect on soybean canopy penetration and grain yield. Agronomy Journal. no. 100, рр. 1488–1492.
18. Kaur, C., Maini, P., Shukla, N.P. (2007). Interaction studies of copper fungicides with biological environment of soil. Current World Environmental. no. 2 (1), рр. 89–92.
19. Chanda, A.K., Ward, N.A., Robertson, C.L., Chen, Z.Y., Schneider, R.W. (2014). Development of a Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection Protocol for Cercospora kikuchii in Soybean Leaves and Its Use for Documenting Latent Infection as Affected by Fungicide Applications. Phytopathology. no. 104(10), рр. 1118–1124.
20. Carmona, M., Sautua, F., Perelman, S., Gally, M., Reis, E.M. (2015). Development and validation of a fungicide scoring system for management of late season soybean diseases in Argentina. Crop Protection. no. 70, рр. 83–91.
21. Swoboda, C., Pedersen, P. (2009). Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield. Agronomy Journal. no. 101, рр. 352–356.
22. Allen, T., Hollier, C., Sikora, E. (2014). A continuing saga: Soybean rust in the continental United States, 2004 to 2013. Outlooks on Pest Management. no. 25, рр.167–174.
23. Kandel, Y.R., Hunt, C., Ames, K., Arneson, N., Bradley, C.A., Byamukama, E., Mueller, D.S. (2021). Meta-Analysis of Soybean Yield Response to Foliar Fungicides Evaluated from 2005 to 2018 in the United States and Canada. Plant Disease. no. 105 (5), рр. 1382–1389.
24. Bluck, G.M., Lindsey, L.E., Dorrance, A.E., Metzger, J.D. (2015). Soybean yield response to rhizobia inoculant, gypsum, manganese fertilizer, insecticide, and fungicide. Agronomy Journal. no. 107 (5), рр. 1757–1765.
25. Bergman, K., Ciampitti, I., Sexton, P., Kovács, P. (2020). Fungicide, insecticide, and foliar fertilizer effect on soybean yield, seed composition, and canopy retention. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. no. 4 (2), рр. 2639–6696. 26. Grabovska, T., Lavrov,V., Grabovskyi, M. (2021). Insects diversity in soybean crops under organic and conventional farming. Scientific Forum “From its roots, organic inspires science, and vice versa”, 6-th ISOFAR conference at the 20th Organic World Congress 2021 in Rennes. France, 179 p.
27. Panth, M., Hassler, S.C., Baysal-Gurel, F. (2020). Methods for Management of Soilborne Diseases in Crop Production. Agriculture. no. 10 (1), 16 p.
28. Siddiqui, Z.S., Ahmed, S. (2006). Combined effects of pesticide on growth and nutritive composition of soybean plants. Pakistan Journal of Botany. no. 38, рр. 721–733.
29. Shendryk, K.M. (2008). Efektivnіst' bіologіchnih ta hіmіchnih zasobіv zahistu soi’ vіd korenevih gnilej [Effectiveness of biological and chemical means of soybean protection against root rot]. Zahist і karantin roslin [Protection and quarantine of plants]. Issue 54, рр. 494–497.
30. Ryabukha, S.S., Sokol, T.V., Ponurenko, S.G., Adamenko, O.P. (2010). Fіtosanіtarnij stan nasіnnja soi’ u shіdnіj chastinі Lіsostepu Ukrai’ni [Phytosanitary condition of soybean seeds in the eastern part of the Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Vіsnik Harkіvs'kogo nacіonal'nogo agrarnogo unіversitetu іm. V.V. Dokuchajeva. Fіtopatologіja ta entomologіja [Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchaeva. Phytopathology and entomology]. no. 1, рр. 104–108.
31. Pavlyshche, A.V., Kiriziy, D.A., Kots, S.Ya. (2017). Reakcіja simbіotichnih sistem soi’ na dіju fungіcidіv za rіznih sposobіv obrobki [Reaction of symbiotic soybean systems to the action of fungicides under different processing methods]. Fіzіologіja roslin ta genetika [Physiology of plants and genetics]. Vol. 49, no. 3, рр. 237–247.
32. Rybachenko, L.I., Kots, S.Ya., Pavlishche, A.V., Rybachenko, O.R., Khomenko, Yu.O. (2021). Osoblivostі funkcіonuvannja soyevo-rizobіal'nih sistem za vplivu fungіcidіv і kompleksnogo preparatu Stimpo [Peculiarities of the functioning of soybean-rhizobial systems under the influence of fungicides and the complex drug Stimpo]. Fіzіologіja roslin і genetika [Physiology of plants and genetics]. Vol. 53, no. 4, рр. 307–319.
33. Kosylovych, G., Golyachuk, Yu. (2020). Zahist soi’ vіd hvorob [Protection of soybeans from diseases]. Vіsnik LNAU. Agronomіja [Bulletin of LNAU. Agronomy]. no. 24, рр. 163–167.
34. Mostovyak, I.I., Kravchenko, O.V. (2018). Formuvannja fotosintetichnoї produktivnostі posіvіv soi’ za vikoristannja rіznih vidіv fungіcidіv ta іnokuljanta u Pravoberezhnomu Lіsostepu Ukrai’ni [Formation of photosynthetic productivity of soybean crops with the use of different types of fungicides and inoculants in the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Vіsnik Umans'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu sadіvnictva [Bulletin of the Uman National University of Horticulture]. no. 2, рр. 21–24.
35. Yeshchenko, V.A. (2014). Osnovi naukovih doslіdzhen' v agronomіi’ [Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy]. Vinnitsa, 332 p.
36. Tribel, S.O. (2001). Metodiki viprobuvannja і zastosuvannja pesticidіv [Methods of testing and application of pesticides]. Kyiv, 448 p.
 
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon mostypan_2_2024.pdf600.74 KB
YEAR: 
2024
AGROBIOLOGY №2 2024