You are here

Головна » 2023 » AGROBIOLOGY №2 2023

Yield and energy efficiency in winter wheat agrocenosis under different fertilization systems in the conditions of the northern part of the Forest-Steppe

The influence of different types of fertilizers on the yield and energy efficiency of winter wheat cultivation was evaluated. It was found that the highest productivity was obtained under the organic-mineral fertilizer system, which involves the combined use of 12 t/ha of cattle bedding manure and mineral fertilizers in a dose of N100Р60К100, applied against the background of two-time fertilization with complex chelated fertilizers at a dose of 2 l/ha, where the yield was 5.67 t/ha, and when applying a double mineral dose (N100Р60К100) and a triple dose (N150Р90К150) – 5.76 and 6.00 t/ha respectively, which in terms of yield growth was lower than the NIR05 values. The combined use of litter manure and mineral fertilizers resulted in a synergistic effect, as winter wheat grain yields were 15–20 % lower when mineral and organic fertilizers were applied separately than when they were applied together. Increasing NPK doses by 1.5 times to N150P90K150 compared to N100P60K100 did not compensate for the lack of manure. Under the organic fertilizer system, the grain yield was the highest when OMBF was applied at a dose of 2 t/ha against a background of pea straw 3 t/ha, which amounted to 5.18 t/ha with an increase of 41 %, compared to the control (straw). The highest levels of energy efficiency were determined for the application of organic-mineral fertilizer of the organic brand in doses of 1 and 2 t/ha (5.4 and 5.3) and OMBF brand 4-4-4 in a dose of 1 t/ha (5.2). Under the organic-mineral system of fertilizing application of N50P30K50 and N100P60K100 at the background of 12 t/ha of manure established the index of energy efficiency at the level of 3.4 and 3.7 units, respectively. Application of cattle manure at a dose of 12 t/ha did not provide a significant difference in crop energy, compared to the variant 6 t/ ha – 75755 and 73305 MJ/ha respectively, but due to increased energy inputs in production and application of more manure Kee was 3.9 and 4.6 respectively.

Key words: cattle manure, fertilizers, OMBF, yield, mineral fertilizers, by-products, fertilizer system, energy efficiency.

 

Degodyuk S.


Mulіarchuk A.


Reference: 
1. Medvedovskyi, O.K., Ivanenko, P.I. (1988). Enerhetychnyi analiz intensyvnykh tekhnolohii v silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi [Energy analysis of intensive technologies in agriculture]. Kyiv, Harvest, 208 p.
2. Kaminskyi, V.F. (2015). Naukovi osnovy efektyvnoho rozvytku zemlerobstva v ahrolandshaftakh Ukrainy [Scientific ground of effective development of agriculture in agrolandscapes of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Edelveis, 428 p.
3. Polovyi, V.M. (2007). Optymizatsiia system udobrennia u suchasnomu zemlerobstvi [Optimization of fertilizer systems in modern agriculture]. Rivne, Volyn amulets, 320 p.
4. Rohalskyi, S.V. (2001). Vidtvorennia enerhetychnoho potentsialu gruntu u Lisostepu [Restoration of the energy potential of the soil in the forest-steppe]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of agricultural science]. no. 4, pp. 75–76.
5. Ivanina, V.V. (2016). Biolohizatsiia udobrennia kultur u sivozminakh [Biologization of fertilizationin crop rotations]. Kyiv, Komprynt, 328 p.
6. Ivanina, V.V. (2013). Rol dobryv v pidvyshchenni enerhetychnoi efektyvnosti ahrotekhnolohii [The role of fertilizers in increasing the energy efficiency of agrotechnologies]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of agricultural science]. no. 3, pp. 20–24.
7. Ivanina, V.V. (2017). Enerhetychna efektyvnist ahrotekhnolohii za riznykh system udobrennia zernoburiakovoi sivozminy [Energy efficiency of agrotechnologies in different fertilizer systems of grain-bucket crop rotation]. Tsukrovi buriaky [Sugar beets]. no. 6(90), pp. 17–19.
8. Sinchenko, V.M. (2004). Efektyvnist suchasnoho zemlerobstva na osnovi yoho enerhetychnoho bazysu [Efficiency of modern agriculture on the basis of its energy basis]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of agricultural science]. no. 11, pp. 14–17.
9. Tanchyk, S.P., Tsiuk, O.A., Tsentylo, L.V. (2015). Naukovi osnovy system zemlerobstva [Scientific fundamentals of agricultural systems]. Vinnytsia, Nilan-LTD, 314 p.
10. Tarariko, Yu.O., Nesmashna, O.Ye., Hlushchenko, L.D. (2011). Enerhetychna otsinka system zemlerobstva i tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur [Energy assessment of agricultural systems and technologies for growing crops]. Kyiv, Nora-print, 60 p.
11. Tarariko, Yu.O., Nesmashna, O.Yu., Berdnikov, O.M., Hlushchenko, L.D., Lychuk, H.I. (2005). Bioenerhetychna otsinka silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva [Bioenergy evaluation of agricultural production]. Kyiv, Agrarian science, 200 p.
12. Tsvei, Ya.P. (2011). Bioenerhetychna otsinka produktyvnosti riznorotatsiinykh sivozmin [Bioenergetic estimation of productivity of diversified crop rotation]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats IBKTsB [Collection of scientific works of the IBKTSB]. Issue 12, pp. 46–55.
13. Tsvei, Ya.P. (2012). Bioenergetychna ocinka produktyvnosti riznorotacijnoi' sivozminy [Bioenergetic estimation of productivity of diversified crop rotation]. Nauk. prac Ìnst. bìoenerg. kulʹt. cukrov. burâkìv [Scientific papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet]. Issue 12, pp. 46–54.
14. Gospodarenko, G.M., Cherno, O.D. (2015). Urozhajnist' pshenyci ozymoi' pislja riznyh poperednykiv na foni tryvalogo zastosuvannja dobryv u sivozmini [Yield of winter wheat after different predecessors against the background of long-term use of fertilizers in crop rotation]. Zemlerobstvo: mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb. [Agriculture: Int. subject of science coll.]. Issue 1, рp. 28–31.
15. Vloh, V.G., Bomba, M.Ya., Lihochvor, V.V. (1998). Dovidnyk z vyroshhuvannja ozymoi' pshenyci [Handbook on the cultivation of winter wheat]. Lviv, Ukrainian Technologies, pp. 54–56.
16. Lebid, E.M., Cherenkov, A.V., Solodushko, M.M. (2008). Osoblyvosti vyroshhuvannja ozymoi' pshenyci u Stepu Ukrainy [Features growing winter wheat in the Steppe of Ukraine]. Nauk.-tehn. bjul. MIP [Scientific and technical Bull. MIP]. Issue 8, pp. 335–344.
17. Gospodarenko, H.M. (2018). Systema zastosuvannja dobryv [Fertilizer application system]. Kyiv, SIK GROUP UKRAINE LLC, 376 p.
18. Chaban, V.G. (1999). Vplyv dobryv ta pestycydiv na produktyvnist' roslynnyctva [The influence of fertilizers and pesticides on the productivity of crop production]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of agro-industrial complex]. no. 11, pp. 29–31.
19. Marchuk, I. (2009). Suchasni dobryva – na varti vrozhaju [Modern fertilizers are worth the harvest]. Propozycija [Offer]. no. 4, pp. 42–45.
20. Grabovskyi, M.B., Pavlichenko, K.V., Kozak, L.A., Kachan, L.M. (2022). Energetychna efektyvnist' vyroshhuvannja gibrydiv kukurudzy dlja vyrobnyctva biogazu za vykorystannja makro-i mikrodobryv [Energy efficiency of growing corn hybrids for biogas production using macro- and microfertilizers]. Zernovi kul'tury [Cereal crops]. no. 1, pp. 100–107. DOI: 10.31867/2523-4544/0212
 
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon degoduk_agro_2_2023.pdf572.85 KB
YEAR: 
2023
AGROBIOLOGY №2 2023