You are here

Productivity and economic efciency of pear-tree plantations under optimized ferilization

Modern technologies of cultivation of seed crops plantations imply high efciency of fruit production while optimizing mineral nutrition of trees. The aim of the research is to increase fruit yield and economic efciency under optimized fertilization of pear trees in a re-growing rain-fed plantation. The results of the research, carried out to study the effect of optimized fertilization on yield capacity, fruit quality and economic efciency of replant pear-tree cultivation, cultivars Conference and Osnovianska (on vegetative rootstock quince A) in different age periods of growth and fruiting, were considered. Based on the results of agro-chemical analyses, the rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers were calculated in the way to compensate the lack of N–NO3 (by a nitrifcation ability of the soil) and forms of К2О, available for plant nutrition, and to make their content equal to optimal levels, scientifcally established for apple-tree and recommended for pear-tree plantations. It was found out that the highest yield capacity of the studied pear-trees was recorded with additional application of nitrogen and nitrogen-potassium fertilizers (background+N30, background+N30К30); it was higher by 27.2 and 36.7, 29.8 and 36.1 %, respectively, as compared with the yield capacity of unfertilized trees, and it was higher by 0.6 and 2.6, 4.7 and 4.2 % for the fertilized trees with the annual application of N90Р60К90 (production control); there the correlation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of plant nutrition was less balanced, the total amount of fertilizers was larger though. Fertilization is a leading factor in the formation of the proftability of pear-tree agrocenosis. The use of various cultivars and practices to apply fertilizers in pear-tree plantations has an impact on the economic indicators of fruit production in different age periods of growth and fruiting.
Key words: pear-tree, varieties, fertilization, yield capacity, marketable quality, revenue, proftability.

 

Reference: 
1. Zhao, ZP, Tong, YA, Liu, F, Wang, XY. (2013). Effects of different long-term fertilization patterns on Fuji apple yield, quality, and soil fertility on Weibei Dryland, Shaanxi Province of Northwest China. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 24(11), рр. 3091–8.
2. Wang, Na, Joost, Wolf, Zhang, Fu-suo. (2016). Towards sustainable intensifcation of apple production in China – Yield gaps and nutrient use efciency in apple farming systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 15(4), рр. 716-725.
3. Kopytko, P.H. (2012). Gruntovi umovy i produktyvnist' nasadzhen' jabluni [Soil conditions and productivity of apple-tree plantations]. Naukovyj Visnyk NUBiP [Proc. of NUBaN], no. 180, pp. 200-209.
4. Kopytko, P.H., Petrenko, S.O., Sliusarenko, V.S. (2018). Urozhajnist' i jakist' plodiv grushi za vyroshhuvannja na riznyh fonah udobrennja ta pozakorenevogo pidzhyvlennja [Yield capacity and pear fruit quality when grown on different fertilization backgrounds and top dressing]. Visnyk UNUS [Proc. of UNUH], no. 1, pp. 72-77. DOI: 10.31395/2310- 0478-2018-1-72-77
5. Kopytko, P.H., Yakovenko, R.V. (2021). G'runtovi umovy ta vrozhajnist' povtorno vyroshhuvanogo jablunevogo sadu za dovgotryvalogo udobrennja [Soil conditions and yield capacity of replant apple orchard under long-term fertilization]. Zb. nauk. prac' UNUS [Proc. of UNUH], no. 98, pp. 34-47. DOI: 10.31395/2415-8240-2021-98-1-34-47
6. Wawrzynczczak, Р., Wojcik, Р. (2012). Nawozenie doglebowe. Sad. no. 3, pp. 60–65. 7. Brunetto, G, Navavítor, G. Ambrosini, G., Comin, J.J., Kaminski, J. (2015). He pear tree response to phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Solos e Nutrição. Rev. Bras. 37 (2). DOI: 10.1590/0100-2945-027/14
8. Yakovenko, R.V., Kopytko, P.G., Petrishina, I.P., Butsyk, R.M., Borysenko, V.V. (2020). Productivity of Pear Plantings Depending on the Content of Main Macroelemants (n, p, k) in the Soil after Optimized Fertilization. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 54, pp. 77–82. DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A-454.
9. Sete, P.B., Ciotta, M.N., Nava, G., Stefanello, L.d.O., Brackmann, A., Berghetti, M.R.P., Cadoná, E.A. and Brunetto, G. (2020). Potassium fertilization effects on quality, economics, and yield in a pear orchard. Agronomy Journal. Vol. 112. DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20235
10. Jadczuk-Tobjasz, E., Zygmuntowska, K. (2008). Reakcja gruszy na zróżnicowane nawożenie potasem w zależności od odmiany, podkładki i nawadniania. W Czynniki wpływające na plonowanie i jakośćowoców roślin sadowniczych. pp. 147-168. 11. Sosna, I. (2000). Wpływ dwóch klonów pigwy oraz dwóch sposobów prowadzenia drzew na wzrost i owocowanie kilku odmian gruszy. Zesz. Nauk. Inst. Sadow. Kwiac. no. 8, pp. 209-216.
12. Nesterchuk, Yu.О., Tupchiy, О.С. (2015). Ekonomichne obg'runtuvannja innovacijno-intensyvnyh system vedennja sadivnyctva [Economic grounds of innovation-intensive systems of horticulture management]. Zb. nauk. prac' UNUS [Proc. of UNUH]. Uman, no. 87, pp. 96-106.
13. Ruliev, V.A. (2005). Efektyvnist' promyslovogo sadu [Efciency of industrial orchard]. Sad, vynograd i vyno Ukrai'ny [Orchard, grapes and wine of Ukraine], no. 1–2, pp. 16–18.
14. Melnyk, V.I., Pohrishcheuk, H.B. (2018). Ekonomichne zrostannja sadivnyctva Ukrai'ny v konteksti innovacijnogo rozvytku [Economic growth f horticulture of Ukraine in the context of innovation development]. Naukovyj visnyk Polissja [Scientifc bulletin of Polissia], no. 1(13), pp. 8–15.
15. Sokoliuk, S., Blenda, N., Tupchiy, O., Nepochatenko, O., Ulanchuk, V., Yakovenko, R. (2020). Features of Formation of Organizational-Integrative Processes In Horticulture. Proceedings of the 35th International Business Information Management Association Conference «Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development during Global Challenges». 1–2 April 2020. Seville, Spain, pp. 14259–14266.
16. Melnyk, О.V. (2017). Intensyvnyj sad: zakladannja i dogljad [Intensive orchard]. Novyny sadivnyctva [News of horticulture], no. 3, part 1, pp. 4-8.
17. Ulanchuk, V.S., Zharun, О.V., Tupchiy, О.V. (2020). Ekonomichna sut' intensyfkacii' sadivnyctva [Economic essence of the intensifcation of horticulture]. Nacional'na ekonomika. Intelekt XXI [Journal of National economics. Intellect of XXI], no. 2, pp. 109-113. DOI: 10.32782/2415- 8801/2020-2.21
18. Kondratenko, P.V., Bublyk, M.O. (1996). Metodyka provedennja pol'ovyh doslidzhen' z plodovymy kul'turamy [Methodology of conducting feld trials with fruit crops]. Kyiv, 95 p.
19. Yeshchenko, V.O. (2014) Osnovy naukovyh doslidzhen' v agronomii' [Principles of scientifc research in agronomy]. Vinnytsia, 332 p.
20. Shestopal, О.М. (2006). Metodyka ekonomichnoi' ta energetychnoi' ocinky typiv plodojagidnyh nasadzhen', sortiv, investycij v osnovnyj kapital, innovacij ta rezul'tativ tehnologichnyh doslidzhen' u sadivnyctvi [Methodology of economic and energy evaluation of the types of fruitberry plantations, cultivars, investments into fxed assets, innovations and results of technological research in horticulture]. Kyiv, 140 p.

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon uakovenko_2_2021-193-199.pdf409.1 KB