You are here
Influence of the method of growing seeds of a three-ploid hybrid of sugar beet on the productivity of root crops
Influence of method of growing seeds of triploid hybrid of sugar beet on root productivity. This article examines the issues of improving the methods of ratio of male-sterile component and pollinator in the cultivation of hybrid sugar beet seeds and how it affects the productivity of root crops. Properly selected ratio of components in the cultivation of seeds of male hybrids allows to avoid a number of negative phenomena in seed production; it is to ensure a low effect of heterosis, the degree of fertility and poor seed quality. The productivity of seed depends on the selection of crossbreeding components, which should be characterized by high productivity and combinatorial ability, and of course on the method of cultivation, the ratio of components and their placement in the hybridization site. Research has shown that from the correct selection of crossbreeding components, the feld area can be used to the maximum and rational. So the yield of seeds from the total and accounting area have different indicators. It was also found that the highest seed yield was observed in variants where a mixture of crossbreeding components was used, with such a scheme and the plantation was used to the maximum. But with such a planting scheme there is an important drawback; it is impossible to avoid mixing the male-sterile component and the pollinator during seed cleaning. When placing the seedlings in strips, the highest yield from the accounting plantation was at a ratio of 6:2, and the lowest at 10:2. Increasing the number of rows of male-sterile component from 6:2 to 10:2 seed germination decreases signifcantly. Higher productivity of root crops was obtained from sowing seeds that were grown with a mixture of crossbreeding components than when growing it in strips.
Key words: seeds, sugar beet, components of hybridization, triploid hybrid, planting scheme, similarity, yield capacity, monoecious, sugar content, sugar collection.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-3469Reference:
1. Ch., Darvin (1949). Pokhodzhennia vydiv [Origin of species]. Kyiv, рр. 56–59.
2. Roik, M.V., Cherednychok, O.I. (2005). Metodyka otsinky i doboriv za tsytolohichnymy ta tsytoembriolohichnymy testamy v selektsiinomu protsesi dlia pokrashchannia biolohichnoi yakosti nasinnia tsukrovykh buriakiv [Methods of evaluation and selection by cytological and cytoembryological tests in the selection process to improve the biological quality of sugar beet seeds]. Naukovi pratsi Instytutu tsukrovykh buriakiv [Scientifc works of the Institute of Sugar Beets]. Kyiv, Polihrafkonsaltynh, Issue 8, рр. 178–189.
3. Roik, M.V., Hizbullin, N.H. (2012). Novi hibrydy tsukrovykh buriakiv ta systema yikh nasinnytstva. Nasinnytstvo: teoriia i praktyka tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia ta ozdorovlennia nasinnia ta sadyvnoho materialu, konkurento-zdatnykh v umovakh Yevropeiskoho rynku [New sugar beet hybrids and their seed production system. Seed production: theory and practice of technologies for growing and improving seeds and planting material, competitive in the European market]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv NAAN Ukrainy [Collection of scientifc works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine]. Simferopol, Arial, Issue 16, рр. 19–21.
4. Doronin, V.A., Busol, V.A., Bielik, Y.V. (2012). Vplyv zakhodiv peredposivnoho obroblennia na biolohichni vlastyvosti nasinnia tsukrovoho buriaka Nasinnytstvo: teoriia i praktyka tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia ta ozdorovlennia nasinnia ta sadyvnoho materialu, konkurentozdatnykh v umovakh Yevropeiskoho rynku [Influence of pre-sowing treatment measures on biological properties of sugar beet seeds Seed production: theory and practice of technologies for growing and improving seeds and planting material, competitive in the European market]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv NAAN Ukrainy [Collection of scientifc works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine]. Simferopol, Arial, Issue 16, рр. 110–112.
5. Kornieieva, M.O., Vlasiuk, M.V., Opanasenko, T.H. (2005). Kombinatsiina zdatnist za skhozhistiu nasinnia zapyliuvachiv pry stvorenni ChS hibrydiv tsukrovykh buriakiv [Combination ability of seed pollinator germination in the creation of sugar beet hybrids]. Tsukrovi buriaky [Sugar beets], no. 4, рр. 13–15.
6. Kornieieva, M.O., Nenka, O.V. (2012). Henetycheyi analiz linii zapyliuvachiv tsukrovoho buriaka umanskoi selektsii za enerhiieiu prorostannia nasinnia [Genetic analysis of sugar beet pollinator lines of Uman selection by seed germination energy]. Naukovi pratsi Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv [Scientifc works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets]. Simferopol, VD «Arial», Issue 16, рр. 113–118.
7. Hlevaskyi, V.I., Rybak, V.O., Shapovalenko, R.M. (2017). Vzaiemozviazok mizh rozmirom nasinnia i produktyvnistiu buriakiv tsukrovykh [Relationship between seed size and sugar beet productivity]. Ahrobiolohiia: zb. nauk. prats BNAU [Agrobiology: Coll. Science work. BNAU]. Bila Tserkva, рр. 71–76.
8. Hrazhdankin, O. (2015). Novi mozhlyvosti z nasinniam tsukrovykh buriakiv vid kompanii Beta seed [New opportunities with sugar beet seeds from Beta seed]. Propozytsiia [Offer], no. 2, pp. 68–69.
9. Balahura, O.V. (2014). Produktyvnist posiviv tsukrovykh buriakiv zalezhno vid henotypu i strokiv sivby [Productivity of sugar beet crops depending on genotype and sowing dates]. Naukovi pratsi Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv [Scientifc works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets]. Kyiv, FOP Korzun D.I., Issue 17, Vol. II, рр. 189–192.
10. Vyshnevska, L.V., Kononenko, L.M., Sichkar, A.O. (2014). Produktyvnist hibrydiv buriaku tsukrovoho v umovakh pravoberezhnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Productivity of sugar beet hybrids in the conditions of the right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Ahrobiolohiia: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Bilotserkiv. nats. ahrar. un-t [Agrobiology: Collection of scientifc works. Bila Tserkva. nat. agrarian. un-t]. Bila Tserkva, no. 1(109), рр. 122–126.
11. Hryniv, S.M. (2010). Udoskonalennia osnovnykh ahrotekhnichnykh pryiomiv vyroshchuvannia tsukrovykh buriakiv suchasnykh hibrydiv u livoberezhnii chastyni Lisostepu Ukrainy: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.09 [Improvement of basic agrotechnical methods of growing sugar beets of modern hybrids in the left-bank part of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine: author's ref. dissertation for the degree of Cand. of Agricultural Science: special. 06.01.09]. Kyiv, 20 р.
12. Ivanina, V.V. (2014). Enerhetychna efektyvnist ahrotekhnolohii za riznykh system udobrennia zerno buriakovoi sivozminy [Energy efciency of agrotechnologies under different fertilizer systems of beet crop rotation]. Tsukrovi buriaky [Sugar beets], no. 2, рр. 15–16.
13. Ionitsoi, Y.S. (2014). Rol volohozabezpechennia v zhyttiezdatnosti hibrydiv buriakiv tsukrovykh riznoho pokhodzhennia [The role of moisture supply in the viability of sugar beet hybrids of different origins]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of Agricultural Science], no. 4, рр. 24–28.
14. Karpuk, L.M.. Kykalo, M.M. (2014). Osoblyvosti rostu i rozvytku biolohichnykh form tsukrovykh buriakiv zalezhno vid norm vysivu nasinnia [Features of growth and development of biological forms of sugar beets depending on seed sowing rates]. Ahrobiolohiia: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Bilotserkiv. nats. ahrar. un-t [Agrobiology: Collection of scientifc works. Bila Tserkva. nat. agrarian. un-t]. Bila Tserkva, no. 1(109), рр. 44–47.
15. Kornieieva, M.O., Melnyk, Y.A., Navrotska, E.E. (2012). Uspadkuvannia vmistu natriiu yak elementa tekhnolohichnoi yakosti koreneplodiv u topkrosnykh ChS hibrydiv tsukrovoho buriaku [Inheritance of sodium content as an element of technological quality of root crops in top-cross hybrids of sugar beet]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva. Ahronomiia [Collection of scientifc works of Uman National University of Horticulture. Agronomy]. Part 1, Issue 78, рр. 75–84.
16. Maksymovych, V. (2014). Tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia tsukrovykh buriakiv [Sugar beet growing technologies]. Kyiv, TOV Synhenta, 100 р.
17. Maslak, O., Ilchenko, O. (2015). Ekonomika tsukrovykh buriakiv v Ukraini [Sugar beet economy in Ukraine]. Propozytsiia [Offer], no. 6, рр. 32–36.
18. Ostrovskyi, L.L. (2012).Produktyvnis hibrydiv tsukrovykh buriakiv ukrainskoi selektsii [Productivity of sugar beet hybrids of Ukrainian selection]. Ahronom [Agronomist], no. 4, рр. 110–116.
19. Bischoff, J. (2013). Verfahren der Bodenbearbeitund zu Zuckerruben im Vergleich. Zuckerrube. no. 4, pp. 30–33.
20. Nelles, F. (2013). Was leisten Nematodenresistenz und-toleranz bei Zuckerruben-sorten? Zuckerrube. no. 4, pp. 48–49.
Download this article:
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 glevaskiy_2022-1-79-84.pdf | 417.92 KB |
YEAR: