You are here

The influence of the basic treatment depth on the feed beets yield in the conditions of Bila Tserkva NAU TPC

The aim of the research is to establish the most effective combination of soil tillage which provides fodder beet high productivity while increasing the fertility of typical soil and root crops quality. 

The studies were conducted at the Training Production Center (NPC) of the Bila Tserkva NAU in 2018–2019. The soil of the experimental site – chernozem is a typical low humus large-dusty-medium-loam granulometric composition. In accordance with the performed analyzes, they are characterized by the following indicators in the arable (0–30 cm) layer: humus content – 3.23 %; lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen – 7.6 mg; available phosphorus – 13.9 mg; mobile potassium – 15.1 mg/100 g soil; the amount of absorbed bases is 25.3 mg eq.; hydrolytic acidity of 2.15 mg /eq/100 g of soil. 

The above data indicate that the soils are relatively fertile. They are low  humus in terms of humus content. The reaction of the soil solution is slightly  acidic.

According to the indicators of mobile forms of phosphorus, potassium, pH of salt extract, they belong to the medium supplied in phosphorus and potassium, and do not need liming.

Phosphorus and potassium content in the soil increases in the fertilized areas. Thus, the introduction of N90P90K90 leads to an increase in the potassium and phosphorus content in the arable soil, respectively: by 25.6 % and 50.0 %, during sowing  and by 23.2 % and 33.3 % in the phase of the third pair of true leaves  compared with unfertilized areas. More intensive growth and development of fodder beet plants on fertilized variants led to equalization of phosphorus and potassium content in the soil according to the variants of the experiment during the harvesting period.

The following weeds dominated on the feed beet crops: Polygonum convolvulus, Persicaria lapathifolia, Agrostis alba, Setaria pumila, Echinochloa crus-galli, Convolvulus arvensis, Raphanus raphanistrum and others.

The yield of fodder beet root increases on the plots with application of N30P30K30, N60P60K60, N90P90K90 under the use of higher doses of fertilizers, compared with the unfertilized plots increased on average for all studied variants by 17.3 t/ha.

Indicators of the structural condition and soil structure the under fodder beets are better under plow cultivation with a depth of 30–32 cm than that of 20–22 cm. %. The yields of fodder beet root under 30–32 cm plow mechanical tillage was the higher by 4.11 t/ha compared to the 20–22 cm plow cultivation. The yield increases with fertilizers doses increase.

Key words: fodder beet, basic tillage, fertilizers, yield.

 

Reference: 
1. Lysogorov, S.D., Kirichenko, V.P. (1991). Formirovanie urozhaja polevyh kul'tur pri oroshenii [Harvesting field crops under irrigation]. Moscow, Agropromizdat, 235 p.
2. Lebed', Je.M., Andrusenko, I.I., Pabat, I.A. (1992). Sivozminy pry intensyvnomu zemlerobstvi [Crop rotations in intensive agriculture]. Kyiv, Harvest, 224 p.
3. Alimov, D.M., Bilonozhko, M.A, Boboro, M.A. (2006). Roslynnyctvo: lab.–prakt. zanjattja: navch. posib. dlja vyshhyh agrarnyh zakladiv osvity I–IV rivniv akredytacii' z naprjamu“Agronomija”[ Plant-growing: laboratory-practical training: a textbook for higher agricultural educational establishments of the I-IV levels of accreditation in the field of "Agronomy"]. Kyiv, Harvest, 392 p.
4. Kalens'ka, S.M., Shevchuk, O.Ja., Dmytryshak, M.Ja., Kozjar, O.M., Demydas', G.I. (2005). Roslynnyctvo [Plant growing]. Kyiv, NAU, 502 p.
5. Filonenko, S.V., Kocherga, A.A., Ljashenko, V.V. Burjakivnyctvo. (2008). Laboratorno-praktychni zanjattja: navchal'nyj posibnyk. (Gryf Ministerstva agrarnoi' polityky Ukrai'ny. Lyst №18-128-13/672 vid 21 kvitnja 2008 r.) [Beet growing. Laboratory-practical classes]. Poltava, Kamelot, 368 p.
6. Ignat'jev, M.O., Bahmat, M.I., Vitvic'kyj, I.A. (2002). Burjakivnyctvo: navch. posibnyk [Beet growing]. Kamianets-Podilskyi, Abetka-NOVA, 204 p.
7. Bahmat, M.I., Ignat'jev, M.O., Vitvic'kyj, I.A. (2003). Tehnologija vyroshhuvannja, zagotivli, zberigannja i pererobky cukrovyh burjakiv: navch. posib. [Technology of growing, harvesting, storage and processing of sugar beets]. Kamianets-Podilskyi, Abetka-NOVA, 295 p.
8. Filonenko, S.V., Kocherga, A.A., Ljashenko, V.V. (2008). Burjakivnyctvo: laboratorno-praktychni zanjattja: navch. posib. [Beet growing: laboratory and practical classes]. Poltava, pp. 367–368.
9. Prymak, I.D., Fedorenko, V.P., Kozak, L.A. (2009). Burjakivnyctvo: pidruch. dlja pidgotov. bakalavriv napr. "Agronomija" u vyshh. navch. zakl. II-IV rivniv akredytacii' m-va agrar. polityky Ukrai'ny [Beet Growing: textbook for the Preparation of Bachelors of Agronomy in Higher Educational Institutions of II-IV Accreditation Levels of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Kolobig, 462 p.
10. Jeshhenko, V.O. (2005). Osnovy naukovyh doslidzhen' v agronomii' [Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy]. Kyiv, Action.
11. Ermantraut, E.R. (2010). Metodyka naukovyh doslidzhen' v agronomii' [Methods of scientific research in agronomy]. Zhytomyr, ZhNAEU.
12. Yenish, P.J., Fry, T.A., Durgan, B.R., Wyse, D.L. (1996). Tillage effects on seed distribution and common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) establishment. Weed Sci. Vol. 44, pp. 815–820.
13. Under, P.W. (1991). Organic matter, nutrient, and pH distribution in no-tillage and conventional tillage semiarid soils. Agronomy Journal. Vol. 83, pp. 186–189.
14. Yenish, J.P., Durgan, B.R., Miller, D.W., Wyse, D.L. (1997). Wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield reduction from common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) competition. Weed Science. Vol. 45, pp. 127–131.
15. Szuwar, I., Andruszkiv, M., Szuwar, A., Koszul, H. (2003). Wpływ różnych systemów nawożenia na plonowanie i jakość lnu długowłóknistego. Zeszyty naukowe Akademii Rolniczej im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie Nr 399 (Sesja naukowa.–Zeszyt 89) Gospodarowanie metodami ekologicznymi na tle zrównoważonego rozwoju południowowschodniej Polski na tle zrównoważonego rozwoju południowo–wschodniej. Polski, Krakow, pp. 53–58.
16. Simmons, F.W., Nafziger, E.D. (2008). Soil Management and Tillage. Illinois Agronomy Handbook. Chapter 10, pp. 133–142.
17. Springett, J.A., Gray, R.A., Reid, J.B. (1992). Effect of introducing earthworms into horticultural land previously denuded of earthworms. Springett, Soil Biology and Biochemistry. no. 24, pp. 1615–1622.
18. Morau, P., Rusu, T. (2012). Effect of tillage systems on soil moisture, soil temperature, soil respiration and production of wheat, maize and soybean crops. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. no. 10, pp. 445–448.
19. Huggins D.R., Reganold J.P. (2008). No-till: The Quiet Revolution. Agriculture Scientific American, Inc. Journal, pp. 71–77.
20. Kazinczi, G., Bres, I., Mikuls, J., Ndasy, E. (2004). Allelopathic effect of Cirsium arvense and Asclepias syriaca. J. Plant Diseases and Protection, Sp. Iss. Vol. 19, pp. 301–308.

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon karpuk_2_2019.pdf224.22 KB