You are here

The environmental sensitivity of potato yield formation in different maturity groups under contrasting hydrothermal conditions

The study investigated the peculiarities of yield formation in 72 potato genotypes belonging to different maturity groups under contrasting hydrothermal conditions during 2022–2025 in Zhytomyr Polissia region. Yield assessments were conducted on the 65th (T1) and 80th (T2) days after planting and at final harvest (T3). Significant interannual variability in yield accumulation rates was observed. In favorable years (2022 and 2025), the rate of yield formation during the T1-T2 period reached 0.40–0.51 t/ha/day, whereas in 2023 it decreased by 43–58 % (P < 0.001). The most critical phase was T2-T3 (days 80–115), when in the drought year of 2023 yield accumulation rates declined by 69–86 % compared with 2022 (P < 0.001). Final yield in favorable years reached 23-28 t/ha, whereas in 2023 it decreased by 2.5–2.7 times (P < 0.001). In 2024, under extreme drought conditions, yield remained 20–28 % lower than in 2022 (P < 0.001), and differences between maturity groups were not significant (P > 0.05). The coefficient of variation increased to 39 % under stress conditions. Mid-maturing genotypes realized the highest yield potential in favorable years (up to 28.2 t/ha in 2025, P < 0.01) but showed greater variability under drought conditions. Early-maturing genotypes had lower maximum productivity but demonstrated relatively more stable responses. Plasticity analysis according to the Eberhart and Russell method revealed changes in β-coefficients during the growing season. At stage T1, all groups exhibited a stable response type (β < 1). By final harvest, mid-maturing genotypes shifted to an intensive response type (β = 1.04), whereas early (β = 0.81) and medium-early (β = 0.91) genotypes retained a stable or moderately plastic adaptation type. Strong correlations were found between productivity and hydrothermal indicators. Final yield showed the strongest association with yield accumulation rate during the T2-T3 period (r = 0.973; P < 0.001), soil moisture index GWET (r = 0.912; P < 0.001), and the number of days with Tmax > 30 °C (r = −0.879; P < 0.001). The regression model (R² = 0.972; P < 0.0001) showed that each 0.1 increase in GWET raises yield by 1.8 t/ha, while each additional day with high temperature decreases it by 0.48 t/ha. It was demonstrated that the decisive period of yield formation is the T2-T3 phase, while the key limiting factors are soil moisture deficit and the number of days with Tmax > 30 °C during July–August. The obtained results may be used for predicting the productivity of potato genotypes under conditions of interannual climatic variability.

Key words: potato, breeding material, ecological plasticity, yield dynamics, hydrothermal stress, moisture deficit, Tmax > 30 °C, GWET, β-coefficient, predictive modeling, adaptability, Zhytomyr Polissia.

Reference: 
1. Koblianska, I., Seheda, S., Khaietska, O., Kalachevska, L., Klochko, T. (2022). Determinants of potato producer prices in the peasant-driven market: the Ukrainian case. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. Vol. 8(3), pp. 26–41. DOI: 10.51599/are.2022.08.03.02
2. Artiukh, T., Bezsmertna, O., Melnyk, D. (2022). Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku rynku kartopli v Ukraini z vrakhuvanням zonalnoi spetsializatsii haluzi [Problems and prospects of potato market development in Ukraine taking into account zonal specialization of the industry]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and Society]. no. 39. DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-54
3. Salehi-Soghadi, Z., Islam, M.S., Manschadi, A.M., Kaul, H.-P. (2023). Transpiration Efficiency of Some Potato Genotypes under Drought. Agronomy. Vol. 13(4), Art. 996. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13040996
4. Qin, T., Wang, Y., Pu, Z., Shi, N., Dormatey, R., Wang, H., Sun, C. (2024). Comprehensive Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses Reveal the Drought Responsive Gene Network in Potato Roots. Plants. Vol. 13(11), Art. 1530. DOI: 10.3390/plants13111530
5. Hanász, A., Zsombik, L., Magyar-Tábori, K., Mendler-Drienyovszki, N. (2024). Effect of Drought and Seed Tuber Size on Agronomical Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under In Vivo Conditions. Agronomy. Vol. 14(6), Art. 1131. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14061131
6. Ansari, W.A., Atri, N., Pandey, M., Singh, A.K., Singh, B., Pandey, S. (2019). Influence of drought stress on morphological, physiological and biochemical attributes of plants: A review. Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia. Vol. 16, pp. 697–709. DOI: 10.13005/bbra/2785
7. Ibrahim Ibrahim, S., Naawe, E.K., Çaliskan, M.E. (2024). Effect of Drought Stress on Morphological and Yield Characteristics of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Breeding Lines. Potato Research. Vol. 67, pp. 529–543. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-023-09655-3
8. Hoelle, J., Khan, A., Asch, F. (2023). Drought affects the synchrony of aboveground and belowground phenology in tropical potato. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. Vol. 210, Art. e12675. DOI: 10.1111/jac.12675
9. Niu, Y., Zhang, K., Khan, K.S., Fudjoe, S.K., Li, L., Wang, L., Luo, Z. (2024). Deficit Irrigation as an Effective Way to Increase Potato Water Use Efficiency in Northern China: A Meta-Analysis. Agronomy. Vol. 14(7), Art. 1533. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14071533
10. Flexas, J., Bota, J., Galmés, J., Medrano, H., Ribas-Carbó, M. (2006). Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: Responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. PhysiologiaPlantarum. Vol. 127, pp. 343–352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00621.x
11. Rudack, K., Seddig, S., Sprenger, H., Köhl, K., Uptmoor, R., Ordon, F. (2017). Drought-stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. Vol. 203, pp. 494–505. DOI: 10.1111/jac.12224
12. Jadoski, S.O., Suchoronczek, A., dos Santos, J. (2017). Effect of water deficit on vegetative development, production and physiological disorders on 'Agata' potato tubers. Applied Research &Agrotechnology. Vol. 10, pp. 97–107.
13. Nasir, M.W., Toth, Z. (2022). Effect of Drought Stress on Potato Production: A Review. Agronomy. Vol. 12(3), Art. 635. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030635
14. Ierna, A., Mauromicale, G. (2023). Ecophysiological and productive response of deficit-irrigated potatoes. Agronomy. Vol. 13(2), Art. 591. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13020591
15. Zerihun, K., Firew, M., Tesfaye, A., Asrat, A. (2020). Morpho-Physiological Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) for Post-Flowering Drought Resistance. Agricultural Science Digest. Vol. 40(1), pp. 19–26. DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-191
16. Gervais, T., Creelman, A., Li, X.-Q., Bizimungu, B., De Koeyer, D., Dahal, K. (2021). Potato Response to Drought Stress: Physiological and Growth Basis. Frontiers in Plant Science. Vol. 12, Art. 698060. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.698060
17. Mthembu, S.G., Magwaza, L.S., Mashilo, J., Mditshwa, A., Odindo, A. (2022). Drought tolerance assessment of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes at different growth stages, based on morphological and physiological traits. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 261, Art. 107361. DOI: 10.1016/j. agwat.2021.107361
18. Tymko, L.V., Furdyha, M.M., Vermenko, Yu.Ya. (2018). Adaptyvna zdatnist riznykh sortiv kartopli v umovakh Pravoberezhnoho Polissia Ukrainy [Adaptive ability of different potato varieties under the conditions of Right-Bank Polissia of Ukraine]. Vyvchennia ta okhorona sortiv roslyn [Plant Varieties Studying and Protection]. Vol. 14(2), pp. 224–229. DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.2.2018.134774
19. Furdyha, M.M. (2022). Adaptyvna zdatnist ta potentsiini vlastyvosti sortiv kartopli selektsii Instytutu kartopliarstva NAAN [Adaptive ability and potential properties of potato varieties bred by the Institute of Potato Research of NAAS]. Ahrarni innovatsii [Agrarian Innovations]. no. 12, pp. 103–109. DOI: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2022.12.16
20. Pysarenko, N.V., Sydorchuk, V.I., Zakharchuk, N.A., Hordiienko, V.V. (2023). Skryninh perspektyvnykh hibrydiv kartopli za pokaznykamy posukhoostiikosti [Screening of promising potato hybrids for drought tolerance indicators]. Vyvchennia ta okhoronasortivroslyn [Plant Varieties Studying and Protection]. Vol. 19(1), pp. 35–43. DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017.19.1.2023.277769
21. Pysarenko, N.V., Sydorchuk, V.I., Zakharchuk, N.A. (2024). Evaluation of potato varieties for drought tolerance, ecological plasticity, adaptability, and consumer qualities at early stages of cultivation. Vegetable and Melon Growing. no. 74, pp. 19–32. DOI: 10.32717/0131-0062-2023-74-19-32
22. Chairi, F., Lateur, M., Muhovski, Y. (2025). Genotypic variation in agronomic and physiological responses of potato cultivars to water stress under greenhouse conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science. Vol. 16, Art. 1692962. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1692962
23. Zinta, R., Tiwari, J.K., Buckseth, T., Thakur, K., Goutam, U., Kumar, D., Challam, C., Bhatia, N., Poonia, A.K., Naik, S., Singh, R.K., Thakur, A.K., Dalamu, D., Luthra, S.K., Kumar, V., Kumar, M. (2022). Root system architecture for abiotic stress tolerance in potato: Lessons from plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. Vol. 13, Art. 926214. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.926214
24. Zhou, B., Yuan, J., Liang, L., Zhang, F., Wang, Y. (2025). Genotype × environment interactions for potato yield and quality traits: Identification of ideotypes adapted in different ecological regions of Northwest China. BMC Plant Biology. Vol. 25(1), Art. 737. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06741-1
25. Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. Vol. 6(1), pp. 36–40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
26. Badr, M.A., El-Tohamy, W.A., Salman, S.R., Gruda, N. (2022). Yield and water use relationships of potato under different timing and severity of water stress. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 271, Art. 107793. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107793
27. Tayyeh, H.K., Mohammed, R. (2023). Analysis of NASA POWER reanalysis products to predict temperature and precipitation in Euphrates River basin. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 619, Art. 129327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129327
28. Muyombo, E.D., Brorsen, W., Krueger, E.S., Ochsner, T.E. (2025). NASA's modeled soil moisture data as an index for forage crop insurance and disaster protection programs: The case of Oklahoma. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 373, Art. 110772. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110772
29. Sonets, T.D., Kyienko, Z.B., Furdyha, M.M., Vermenko, Yu.Ya. (2019). Adaptovanist sortiv kartopli do gruntovoklimatchnykh umov Polissia ta Lisostepu Ukrainy [Adaptability of potato varieties to soil-climatic conditions of the Polissia and Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine]. Vyvchennia ta okhoronasortivroslyn [Plant Varieties Studying and Protection]. Vol. 15(1), pp. 93–98. DOI: 10.21498/2518- 1017.15.1.2019.162488
30. Yatsenko, N., Ulianych, O., Yatsenko, V., Feshchenko, V., Chubko, O. (2024). Adaptive variability of early potato in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science. Vol. 28(3), pp. 67–77. DOI: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/3.2024.67
31. Bondarchuk, A.A., Koltunov, V.A. (2019). Kartopliarstvo: metodyka doslidnoi spravy [Potato Growing: Research Methodology]. Vinnytsia, LLC «TVORY», 652 p. Available at: https://www. ikar.org.ua/_files/ugd/69bb4c_77462c9ea8804515b090c3254bffeada.pdf
32. Sparks, A. (2018). Nasapower: A NASA POWER Global Meteorology, Surface Solar Energy and Climatology Data Client for R. Journal of Open Source Software. Vol. 3(30), Art. 1035. DOI: 10.21105/joss.01035
33. Reichle, R.H., Draper, C.S., Liu, Q., Girotto, M., Mahanama, S.P.P., Koster, R.D., De Lannoy, G.J.M. (2017). Assessment of the MERRA-2 land surface hydrology estimates. Journal of Climate. Vol. 30(8), pp. 2937–2960. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0720.1
34. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, FAO, 300 p.
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon pysarenko_1-2026.pdf568.39 KB