You are here

Головна » 2024 » AGROBIOLOGY №1 2024

Duration of interphase and growing periods of soybean varieties depending on hydrothermal conditions and application of soil and post-emergence herbicides

The purpose of the research was to determine the duration of the interphase and growing periods of soybean varieties depending on the use of soil and post-emergence herbicides. The research was conducted in 2021- 2023 in the conditions of LLC «Savarske» Obukhiv district, Kyiv region. Experiment scheme: Factor A. Varieties of soybeans. 1. «Aurelina»; 2. ES «Commandоr»; 3. ES «Navigator». Factor B. Herbicides. 1. Control (water treatment); 2. «Primekstra TZ Gold» 500 k. s. (4.5 l/ha), before crop seedlings emergence; 3. «Frontier Optima» (1.2 l/ha) + «Stomp» 330 (5 l/ha), before crop seedlings emergence; 4. «Bazagran» (3 l/ha) + «Fusilade Forte 150 ES» (1 l/ha) in the phase of 4-5 leaves of the crop; 5. «Korum» (2 l/ha) + «Achiba» (2 l/ha), in the phase of 2-4 leaves of the crop. The total area of the elementary plot is 144 m2 ; the registration plot is 120 m2 . The experiment was repeated three times. According to the observations, it was found that in 2021 the weather conditions were favorable for the growth, development and formation of soybean productivity. Precipitation amount during the growing season was 324.1 mm; the average air temperature was 17.8°C. In 2023 these figures were 275.9 mm and 18.0°C. In 2022, due to dry conditions, precipitation amount did not exceed 240.2 mm and the average air temperature was 17.2°C. The hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) in May 2021 was 2.7, and in 2022 and 2023 it was 0.5. High temperatures and decreased precipitation in June 2022 led to a decrease of the hydrothermal coefficient to 0.4. The weather conditions in June 2021 and 2023 resulted in a HEC of 0.7 and 0.8. July 2021 and 2023 were excessively wet in terms of the HCC, and in 2022 there was a slight drought. September 2021 was quite dry (0.4) and in 2022, on the contrary, it was too wet (2.8). The biggest growing season length was for the early maturing soybean variety «Aurelina» (106-109 days) and 97-99 and 99-101 days for the very early maturing varieties «ES Commander» and «ES Navigator». In the variants of herbicide application the duration of the growing season was 2-3 days shorter compared to the control plots. There were no differences in the duration of interphase or growing season between the varieties using soil or post-emergence herbicides. The herbicides effect was the greatest on the change in the duration of the «interphase flowering period to full grain maturity» (BBCH 66-87). Soybean vegetation duration has an average connection with precipitation (r = 0.73), air temperature (r = 0.62) and strong feedback with the hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) (r = -0.90).

Key words: soybeans, varieties, herbicides, vegetation length, interphase periods, air temperature, precipitation amount.

 

Grabovskiy M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-7896


Mostypan O.


Panchenko T. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1114-5670


Lozinskiy M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6078-3209


Pavlichenko K.


Reference: 
1. Rybalchenko, A.M., Serdyuk, A.E. (2023). Vpliv sortovih vlastivostej na formuvannja elementіv produktivnostі ta urozhajnіst' soi' v umovah Lіvoberezhnogo Lіsostepu Ukrai'ni [Influence of varietal properties on the formation of elements of productivity and productivity of soybeans in the conditions of the Left Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Agrarnі іnnovacіi' [Agrarian innovations]. Vol. 21, рр. 88–92.
2. Masuda, T., Goldsmith, P.D. (2009). World soybean production: area harvested, yield, and long-term projections. International food and agribusiness management review. Vol. 12, no. 4, рр. 1–20.
3. Hamza, M., Basit, A.W., Shehzadi, I., Tufail, U., Hassan, A., Hussain, T., Hayat, H.M. (2024). Global Impact of Soybean Production: A Review. Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. no. 16(2), рр. 12–20.
4. Pagano, M.C., Miransari, M. (2016). The importance of soybean production worldwide. Abiotic and biotic stresses in soybean production. Academic Press. pp. 1–26.
5. Oliveira, M.C., Jhala, A.J., Gaines, T., Irmak, S., Amundsen, K., Scott, J.E., Knezevic, S.Z. (2017). Confirmation and control of HPPD-inhibiting herbicide resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in Nebraska. Weed Technol. no. 31, рр. 67–79. DOI: 10.1017/wet.2016.4.
6. Prymak, I., Grabovskyi, M., Fedoruk, Y., Pokotylo, I., Lozinskyi, M., Panchenko, T., Yezerkovska, L., Karaulna, V., Kozak, L., Obrazhyi, S., Prysiazhniuk, N., Fedoruk, N. (2023). Change of weediness in a five-field crop rotation by minimizing the main tillage of the soil and different levels of fertilizer and its impact on crop productivity. Scientific Papers. Series "Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and rural development". Vol. 23, Issue 4, рр. 725–736.
7. Tsykov, V.S., Tkalich, Yu.I. (2014). Shkodochinnіst' segetal'no-ruderal'nih bur’janіv [Harmfulness of segetal-ruderal weeds]. Bjuleten' Іnstitutu sіl's'kogo gospodarstva stepovoi' zoni NAAN Ukrai'ni [Bulletin of the Institute of Agriculture of the Steppe Zone of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. no. 6, рр. 38–41.
8. Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L.M., Nelson, R. (2001). Phytotoxic response and yield of Soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone and flumiox-azin. Weed Technol. no. 15, рр. 95–102. DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0095:PRAYOS]2.0.CO;2
9. Nimenko, S.S., Grabovskyi, M.B. (2022). Vpliv zahodіv kontroljuvannja chisel'nostі bur’janіv na fіtosanіtarnij stan posіvіv soi' za organіchnogo viroshhuvannja [The influence of weed control measures on the phytosanitary status of soybean crops under organic cultivation]. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo [Irrigated agriculture]. Issue 78, рр. 69–74.
10. Pravdyva, L.A., Grabovskyi, M.B., Lozinskyi, M.V., Kachan, L.M. (2023). Kontroljuvannja zabur’janenostі posіvіv soi' agrotehnіchnimi zahodami v umovah Pravoberezhnogo Lіsostepu Ukrai'ni [Control of weediness of soybean crops by agrotechnical measures in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Agrarnі іnnovacіi' [Agrarian innovations]. no. 20, рр. 62–68.
11. Zadorozhnyi, V.S. (2012). Bur’jani v agrocenozah soi' ta metodi borot'bi z nimi [Weeds in soybean agrocenoses and methods of their control]. Kormi і kormovirobnictvo [Fodder and fodder production]. no. 71, рр. 49–54. 12. Gaikwad, R.P., Pawar, V.S. (2003). Effect of herbicides on soybean crop and weeds. Indian Journal of Weed Science. Vol. 35, no. 1–2, рр. 145–147.
13. Young, B.G., Young, J.M., Matthews, J.L., Owen, M.D., Zelaya, I.A., Hartzler, R.G., Bollero, G.A. (2003). Soybean development and yield as affected by three postemergence herbicides. Agronomy Journal. no. 95 (5), рр. 1152–1156.
14. Datta, A., Ullah, H., Tursun, N., Pornprom, T., Knezevic, S.Z., Chauhan, B.S. (2017). Managing weeds using crop competition in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop protection. no. 95, рр. 60–68. 15. Shcatula, Y. (2021). Chemical protection of soybean crops against weeds. Sciences of Europe. no. 67–2, рр. 27–35.
16. Shevnikov, M.Ya. (2007). Scientific basis of soybean cultivation in the conditions of the left-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine: monograph. Poltava, 208 p. 17. He, L., Jin, N., Yu, Q. (2020). Impacts of climate change and crop management practices on soybean phenology changes in China. Science of the Total Environment. Vol. 707, 135638. 18. Fatichin Zheng, S.H., Arima, S. (2013). Varietal difference in early vegetative growth during seedling stage in soybean. Plant Production Science. Vol. 16. (1), рр. 77–83.
19. Begum, N., Wang, L., Zhao, T. (2022). Effects of temperature regimes on seed germination and early growth of different soybean cultivars. International Journal of Applied and Experimental Biology. Vol. 1 (2), рр. 75–85.
20. Bilyavska, L.G., Bilyavskyi, Yu.V., Shapoval, O.S., Panchenko, S.S. (2020). Suchasnij stan ta perspektivi nasіnnictva soi' v Lіsostepu Ukraїni [Current state and prospects of soybean seed production in the Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Vіsnik Poltavs'koi' derzhavnoi' agrarnoi' akademіi' [Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy]. no. 4, рр. 45–52.
21. Mazur, O.V. (2012). Vivchennja zv’jazku trivalostі vegetacіjnogo perіodu z urozhajnіstju sortіv roslin soi' [Study of the relationship between the duration of the growing season and the productivity of soybean plant varieties]. Zbіrnik naukovih prac' Vіnnic'kogo nacіonal'nogo agrarnogo unіversitetu. Sіl's'kogospodars'kі nauki [Collection of scientific works of the Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Agricultural sciences]. Issue 10 (50), рр. 100–105.
22. Patterson, D.T. (1995). Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed science. Vol. 43, no. 3, рр. 483–490.
23. Yeshchenko, V.A. (2014). Osnovi naukovih doslіdzhen' v agronomіi' [Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy]. Vinnitsa, PE "TD" Edelweiss and K"", 332 p.
24. Volkodav, V.V. (2001). Metodika derzhavnogo sortoviprobuvannja sіl's'kogospodars'kih kul'tur [Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops]. Kyiv, Alefa, 76 p.
25. Kaminsky, V. (2006). Agrometeorologіchnі osnovi virobnictva zernobobovih kul'tur v Ukrai'nі [Agrometeorological basis of production of leguminous crops in Ukraine]. Vіsnik agrarnoi' nauki [Herald of Agrarian Science]. no. 7, рр. 20–25.
26. Grabovskyi, M.B., Grabovska, TO.O., Obrazhiy, S.V. (2014). Vpliv gіdrotermіchnih umov vegetacіi' na urozhajnіst' gіbridіv kukurudzi rіznih grup stiglostі v umovah Central'nogo Lіsostepu Ukrai'ni [The influence of hydrothermal conditions of vegetation on the yield of corn hybrids of different maturity groups in the conditions of the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Agrobіologіja [Agrobiology]. no. 1, рр. 57–62.
27. Milenko, O.G. (2015). Zmina tryvalosti periodu vegetacii' ta faz rostu i rozvytku roslyn soi' zalezhno vid umov vyroshhuvannja [Changes in the duration of the vegetation period and phases of growth and development of soybean plants depending on growing conditions]. Vіsnik Poltavs'koi' derzhavnoi' agrarnoi' akademіi' [Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy]. no. 1–2, рр. 165–171.
 
Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon grabovskiy_1_2024.pdf909.99 KB
YEAR: 
2024
AGROBIOLOGY №1 2024