You are here

Ecological aspects of regulation of spider mites number on vegetable crops in the greenhouses

Vegetable greenhouses make one of the leading sectors of agriculture in Ukraine, which allows to obtain high yields per unit area and provide the population with vegetable products all year round. A lot of pests like polyphagous, greenhouse whitefly, thrips, aphids, shovels, nematodes and mites cause great damage to vegetable crops in greenhouses. These kinds are eco-plastic, with high fertility and low mortality in greenhouse conditions.
Spider mites (class of arachnids – Arachnida, subclass mites – Acari, family acaricide – Acaridae) are widespread and dangerous pests in greenhouses, which feed on more than 200 different plants.
Conditions of greenhouses define the specificity of plants protections. A lot of cultivations(30-40 in a vegetation season), failure to comply with terms of waiting cause vegetables products pollution with pesticides and pests resistance to chemicals.
Consequently, the most effective method of plant protection against the pests is applications to biological preparations which can significantly reduce pesticide and receive stable yields of environmentally safe vegetable production.
The monitoring conducted during 2015-2016 in the greenhouses in Kiev region revealed three species of spider mites: common (Tetranychus urticae), red (T. cinnabarinus), and T. bimaculatus. among which the first two dominated.
It was found out that cucumbers planting were the most populated with spider mites (an average of 45.3 % of plants with an average number of 64.3 specimen / leaf), tomatoes – up to 24.5 % of the plants. Much less populated with mites were green crops (15.6 %) with an average amount of 14.5 specimen / leaf, though arugula planting in the spring – summer growing season were settled to 34.5-43.4 %, and the number reached to 34.5 specimen / plant.
Constant feed base, lack of natural predators, optimum temperature and humidity in greenhouses, as well as the ability to feed on various weeds are favorable factors for maintaining populations of spider mites during the growing season.
Assessment of the efficacy of biologics to protect vegetable crops from spider mites was made on the basis of monitoring with regard to the maximum period of their harm.
Double spraying of cucumbers with biological preparations hindered the development of spider mites by 65.5-72.3 % in the variants with Bitoksybazilyn in liquid and dry forms; 89.5 % – with Aktofit; on tomatoes the efficacy of biological preparations ranged 66.7 to 75 %.
The amount of herbivores on the green crops in experimental variants decreased by 65.2-73.4 %. Biological preparations Aversyktyn-C, Aktarofit and Matryn provide 100 % technical efficiency against mites on cucumbers, tomatoes and green crops.
It has been found out that at the beginning of the growing season mites colonize the plants rapidly on the periphery of greenhouses, near metal and heat radiators, then they settled throughout the greenhouse. Delays in treatment causes  significant increase in mites population.
Strict adherence to approved standards and the multiplicity of treatments promotes longer preservation of efficiency of remedies and is one of the important ways to prevent the resistance.
Long-term studies show that if spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) prevail on vegetables plantations, biological preparation Aktofit 0.2 % c. e. provides effective reduction of its population. If populations of mites T. cinnabarinus and T. bimaculatus.dominate, the protection system should be improves as these species show a natural resistance to many acaricides including avermectines.
Key words: cucumbers, tomatoes, green crops, greenhouses, spider mites, biological preparations.
 
Reference: 

1. Berger, L. P. (1999). Biopreparaty protiv rastitel'nojadnyh kleshhej [Biological preparations against herbivorous mites]. Novosibirsk, pp. 23–24.

2. Berezina, N. V. Biopreparaty. Sistema jeffektivnogo primenenija dlja zashhity ovoshhnyh kul'tur [Biological preparations. System of effective application for the protection of vegetable crops]. Vestnik ovoshhevoda [Herald of the vegetable grower], 2009, no. 2, pp. 49–51.

3. Bogach, G. I. Biometod v zashhishhennom grunte [Biological method in the greenhouses]. Zashhita rastenij [Protection of Plants], 1989, no. 2, pp. 9–14.

4. Brovko, G. A., Brovko, S. P. Biometod poluchaet priznanie [Biological method is receives recognition]. Zashhita i karantin rastenij [Protection and quarantine of plants], 2007, no. 11, 32 p.

5. Humerov, I. M. (2008). Primenenie biopreparatov kak jekologicheski bezopasnyj i jenergosberegajushhij priem zashhity ovoshhnyh ot boleznej [Application biological preparations is ecology and energysaving method protection vegetable from diseases]. Mat. Vser. nauchno-prakt. konf. «Jenergosberegajushhie tehnologii proizvodstva produkcii rastenievodstva» [Scientific and Practical Conference" Energy-saving production technology products рlant growing]. Ufa, Part 2. pp. 117–119.

6. Dolzhenko, V. I., Burke, L. A., Ivanova, G. P., Dolzhenko, T.V. (2012). Novye preparaty na osnove metabolitov aktinomicetov dlja reguljacii chislennosti vreditelej [New preparations on the based of metabolites аctinomycetes for regulation number of pest]. Biologicheskaja zashhita rastenij – osnova stabilizacii agrojekosistem [Biological protection of plants – the basis ecosystem stabilization], pp. 136–138.

7. Klyshyna, L. I. (2012). Primenenie biologicheskih sredstv zashhity rastenij v zashhishhennom grunte [Application of biology protection means plants in greenhouse]. Nizhegorodskij agrarnyj vestnik [Nizhny Novgorod agriculture Journal], pp. 27–30.

8. Neudachina, E. I. (1985). Ob ispol'zovanii bakterial'nyh preparatov protiv vreditelej zashhishhennogo grunta [About the use of bacterial preparations against pests of protected soil]. Jentomopatogennye bakterii i griby v zashhite rastenij [Entomopathogenic bacteria and fungi in plant protection]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University, pp. 43–47.

9. Novozhilov, K. V. Nekotorye napravlenija jekologizacii zashhity rastenij [Some directions of the ecologization of plant protection]. Zashhita i karantin rastenij [Protection and quarantine of plants], 2003, no. 8, pp. 14–17.

10. Uzhevskaya, S. F., Tregub, N. S., Kryvytskaya, T. N. (2012). Insekticidnaja aktivnost' preparata na osnove shtamma Bacillus thuringiensis 15 protiv vreditelej [Improvement activity of the preparations based on Bacillus thuringiensis strains against pests 15]. Strukturno-funkcional'nye izmenenija v populjacijah i soobshhestvah na territorijah s raznym urovnem antropogennoj nagruzki [Structural and functional changes in populations and communities in areas with different levels of anthropogenic load], pp. 219–220.

11. Francesco, Bravacini, Marco, Mosti. (2012). Osnovnye sredstva biokontrolja, ispol'zuemye v sredizemnomorskih teplicah [The basic means of biocontrol used in Mediterranean greenhouses]. Biologicheskaja zashhita rastenij – osnova stabilizacii agrojekosistem [Biological protection of plants is the basis of stabilization of agroecosystems], pp. 62–64.

12. Shipilova, E. Y. Biometod v sisteme integrirovannoj zashhity ovoshhnyh i dekorativnyh kul'tur v teplicah [Biological method in the system protection vegetable and decorative crops in greenhouses]. Gavrish, 2010, no. 6, pp. 25–27.

13. Yakovlev, I. N., Hunchback, T. N. Bitoksibacillin v sisteme zashhity rastenij ot pautinnyh kleshhej [Bytoksybatsyllyn in the system of protection of plants from spider mites]. Gavrish, 2013, no. 4, pp. 23-29.

14. Gonzdlez-Cabrera, Joel, Alberto, Urbaneja. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) in controlling the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera), 2011, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 71–80.

15. Lasota, J. A., Dybas, R. A. Avermectins, a novel class of compound: Implications for use in arthropod pest control. Annu. Rev. Entomol, 2010, vol. 36, pp. 91–117.

16. Peng, G., McGregor, L., Lahlali, R. Potential biological control of clubroot on canola and crucifer vegetable crops. Plant Pathol, 2011, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 566–574.

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon tkalenko_1_2017.pdf292.26 KB