You are here

Головна » 2023 » AGROBIOLOGY №2 2023
×

Error message

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in bootstrap_table() (line 238 of /var/www/html/sites/all/themes/bootstrap/templates/system/table.func.php).

Preservation of quality indicators of wild strawberries during treatment with chitosan

Food wastes reducing, as well as non-invasive methods to extend the shelf life of perishable fruits, are important global challenges for scientists and entrepreneurs. With Ukrainian producers entering to foreign markets, the relevance of the topic of high-quality storage of fruit and vegetable products takes on special importance. The higher the yield and the number of berry crops grown by our farmers, the more challenges there are regarding the processing, storage and logistics of the harvested crops. In practice, it is difficult to provide optimal conditions for preserving quality, freshness, taste, aroma, and appearance due to the delicacy and capriciousness of products. Garden strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) is a highly nutritious and economically important berry crop with a short shelf life. This is a seasonal berry that is on the market for only a few months. During mass harvesting period strawberries is the leader in the number of losses among all berry crops due to its physiological characteristics. This paper proposes the use of chitosan to extend the shelf life of strawberries. The effect of are-treatment with chitosan solutions of different concentrations was studied. To assess the impact of are-treatment on quality indicators of strawberries the research was conducted every third day of storage, determining weight loss; m.h. SRR; m.h. organic acids; m.h. of sugars. Strawberrries were treated with chitosan solutions of three concentrations (0.1; 0.2; 0.3 %) by full immersion for 1 min. The treated berries were left until completely dry. Dry treated berries and the control ones were weighed and placed in perforated plastic containers with a capacity of 500 g and stored in a refrigerator at a temperature of 0+2 o C. Berries without treatment were considered as control. Strawberries of the «Dukat» variety grown in 2022–2023 accumulated an average of 10.4 % of dry soluble substances and 1.1 % of organic acids. It was found that the post-harvest treatment of strawberries with a chitosan solution ensured their highest preservation compared to the control, which proves the effectiveness of its application. Pre-treatment of strawberries with a chitosan solution slowed down the loss of dry soluble substances by 0.2–0.9 %, and organic acids by 0.04–0.12 % of the control.

Key words: garden strawberries, chitosan, storage, pre-treatment, quality indicators, berries.

 

Blahopoluchna A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5897-0120


Liakhovska N.


Zadorozhna О.


Reference: 
1. González-Domínguez, R., Sayago, A., Akhatou, I., Fernández-Recamales, Á. (2020). Multi-chemical profiling of strawberry as a traceability tool to investigate the effect of cultivar and cultivation conditions. Foods. Vol. 9 (1), 96 p. DOI: 10.3390/foods9010096
2. Garzoli, S., Cairone, F., Carradori, S. (2020). Effects of Processing on Polyphenolic and Volatile Composition and Fruit Quality of Clery Strawberries. Antioxidants. Vol. 9, no. 7, 632 p. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9070632
3. Jurgiel-Małecka, G., Gibczyńska, M., Siwek, H., Buchwał, A. (2017). Comparison of fruits chemical composition of selected cultivars wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.) Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. Vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 204–210. DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2017/82.4.6
4. Petkova, Z., Nedyalkova, K. (2020). Multiannual growing of remontant strawberries (opportunities for biological production). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 513–519.
5. Nestby, R., Sønsteby, A. (2017). Effect of plant type and delayed planting on growth and yield parameters of two short day strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars in open field. Journal of Berry Research. Vol. 7(3), pp. 179–194.
6. Hancock, J.F., Finn, C.E., Luby, J.J. (2010). Reconstruction of the strawberry, Fragaria× ananassa, using genotypes of F. virginiana and F. chiloensis. Hort Science. Vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1006–1013. DOI: 10.21273/ HORTSCI.45.7.1006
7. Palmieri, L., Masuero, D., Martinatti, P. (2016). Genotype by environment effect on bioactive compounds in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 4180–4189. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8290
8. de Jesús Ornelas-Paz, J., Yahia, E.M., Ramírez-Bustamante, N. (2013). Physical attributes and chemical composition of organic strawberry fruit (Fragaria x ananassa Duch, Cv. Albion) at six stages of ripening. Food Chemistry. Vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 372–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.006
9. Skupień, K., Oszmiański, J. (2004). Comparison of six cultivars of strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) grown in northwest Poland. European Food Research and Technology. no. 219 (1), pp. 66–70. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-004-0918-1
10. Wiącek, A.E., Gozdecka, A., Jurak, M. (2018). Physicochemical characteristics of chitosan–TiO2 biomaterial. 1. Stability and swelling properties. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. no. 57(6), pp. 1859–1870. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04257
11. Lizardi-Mendoza, J., Monal, W.M.A., Valencia, F.M.G. (2016). Chemical characteristics and functional properties of chitosan. In Chitosan in the preservation of agricultural commodities. Academic Press. pp. 3–31. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802735-6.00001-X
12. Zhuikova, Y.V., Zhuikov, V.A., Zubareva, A.A. (2020). Physicochemical and biological characteristics of chitosan/κ-carrageenan thin layer-by-layer films for surface modification of Nitinol. Micron. Vol. 138, no. 102922. DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2020.102922
13. Manigandan, V., Karthik, R., Ramachandran, S., Rajagopal, S. (2018). Chitosan applications in food industry. In Biopolymers for food design. pp. 469–491. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811449-0.00015-3
14. Harkin, C., Mehlmer, N., Woortman, D.V. (2019). Nutritional and additive uses of chitin and chitosan in the food industry. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. no. 36, pp. 1–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030- 16581-9_1
15. El-Aidie, S.A.A.M. (2018). A Review on Chitosan: Ecofriendly Multiple Potential Applications in the Food Industry. International Journal of Advancement in Life Sciences Research. pp. 1–14.
16. Hu, Z., Gänzle, M.G. (2019). Challenges and opportunities related to the use of chitosan as a food preservative. Journal of applied microbiology. no. 126(5), pp. 1318–1331. DOI: 10.1111/jam.14131
17. Gutiérrez, T.J. (2017). Chitosan applications for the food industry. Chitosan: derivatives, composites and applications. Wiley-Scrivener Publisher. pp. 185–232.
18. Tian, B., Liu, Y. (2020). Chitosan based biomaterials: From discovery to food application. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. no. 31(11), pp. 2408– 2421. DOI: 10.1002/pat.5010
19. Hernández-Téllez, C.N., Plascencia-Jatomea, M., Cortez-Rocha, M.O. (2020). Chitosan-based bionanocomposites: development and perspectives in food and agricultural applications. In Chitosan in the preservation of agricultural commodities. pp. 315–338. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802735-6.00012-4
20. Romanazzi, G., Feliziani, E. (2016). Use of chitosan to control postharvest decay of temperate fruit: effectiveness and mechanisms of action. In Chitosan in the preservation of agricultural commodities. pp. 155–177. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802735-6.00006-9
21. Blahopoluchna, A., Liakhovska, N. (2021). Effect of chitosan pretreatment on the quality of strawberries during cold storage. DOI: 10.15673/fst.v15i3.2151

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon blagopoluchna_agro_2_2023.pdf432.56 KB
YEAR: 
2023
AGROBIOLOGY №2 2023