You are here
Inheritance of resistance of spring barley to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in F1 and variability in F2 in the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine
The nature of the inheritance of resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in the crosses of genotypes of spring barley in F1 and transgressive variability in F2 populations are investigated. Inheritance of the trait of resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in F1, by hybridization of genotypes of spring barley with known genes of resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in European varieties Eunova (mlo11) and Barke (mlo9), which are located on chromosome 1H, was positively dominated. Inheritance of the F1 trait in Aspen (mlo11) and Adonis (mlo9) cultivars was partially positive. The influence of parental pairs for hybridization on the indicators of the degree of phenotypic dominance, hypothetical and true heterosis was established. Resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in F1 hybrids was observed heterosis (positive dominance) in fve hybrid combinations (hp = 1.1–1.9 %): Barke/Badoryi, Barke/Sanktrum, Parnas/Rostentsii, Badoryi/ Barke, Eunova/Zvershennia. Hypothetical heterosis (Ht) in F1 was observed in 13 of 16 hybrids (from +2.8 % to +97.6 %). A positive value of true heterosis (Htb) in F1 was observed in 15 hybrids out of 16 (from +1.9 % to +98.8 %). Inheritance of the trait of resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in all studied hybrids was influenced by the cytoplasm of the mother plant, except for the hybrid Eunova / Triangel, where the influence of the nuclear apparatus was detected. Hybrids were found in the F 2 population with high resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei, which exceeded the parental components, which indicates a signifcant shaping process and the possibility of selection on the basis of the studied trait. The degree of positive transgression ranged from 16.0 % to 73.0 % in hybrids Aspen / Skarlet, Adonis / Vanja, Barke / Badoryi, Barke / Sanktrum, Eunova / Triangel and Eunova / Zvershennia, where highly resistant varieties were used for the mother form. The combinations in which the frequency of transgression was observed in more than 50.0 % of plants are hybrids: Eunova / Triangel, Barke / Sanktrum, Eunova / Zvershennia, Parnas / Rostentsii and Barke / Badoryi.
Key words: spring barley, resistance, Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei, combinations of crossing, inheritance, F1, true and hypothetical heterosis, degree of phenotypic dominance, F 2, degree and frequency of transgressions.
Reference:
1. Zviahintseva, A.M., Petrenkova, V.P. (2012). Kombinatsiina zdatnist vykhidnoho materialu yachmeniu yaroho za kompleksom biolohichnykh oznak v systemi dialelnykh skhreshchuvan [The combination capacity of the source material of the Yarogo barley according to the complex of biological signs in the system of dialeth crosses]. Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo [Selection and seeding]. Vol. 102, pp. 30–35.
2. Oleinikov, Ye. S. (2017). Prohnoz rozvytku khvorob lystia pshenytsi ozymoi [Forecast of diseases of winter wheat leaves]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Fitopatolohiia ta entomolohiia [The Bulletin of Kharkiv national agrarian university. Phytopathology and Entomology], no. 1-2. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/Vkhnau_ento_2017_1-2_22
3. Babushkina, T.V., Petrenkova, V.P., Golik, O.V. (2015). Uspadkuvannia stiikosti do tverdoi sazhky v F1 i F2 hibrydiv pshenytsi miakoi yaroi [Inheritance of resistance to head smut in F 1 and F2 of bread spring wheat hybrids]. Visnyk TsNZ APV Kharkivskoi oblasti [Bulletin of the CNS APV Kharkiv region]. Vol. 19, pp. 13–21.
4. Osmachko, O.M., Vlasenko, V.A., Bakumenko, O.M., Tao, Ye, Oshomok, T.V. (2019). Stiikist do boroshnystoi rosy zrazkiv Triticum Aestivum L. 4th WWSRRN CIMMYT v umovakh pivnichno-skhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Evaluation of CIMMYT’S Triticum Aestivum L. accessions from the 4 th WWSRRN for resistance to powdery mildew in the northeastern forest steppe of Ukraine]. Henetychni resursy roslyn [Genetic resources of plants], no. 4, pp. 74–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36814/pgr.2019.24.06
5. Dreiseitl, A. (2020). Specifc resistance of barley to powdery mildew, its use and beyond: a concise critical review. Plant Genetics and Genomics. A section of Genes. Vol. 11(9), 971 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11090971
6. Chrpova, J., Šip, V., Štočkova, L., Stemberkova, L., Tvarůžek, L. (2011). Resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding. Vol. 47(2), pp. 58–63.
7. Vasko, N.I., Kozachenko, M.R., Zvyagintseva, A.N. (2012). Yachmin: metodychni pidkhody ta rezultaty selektsii na stiikist do osnov-nykh khvorob ta shkidnykiv. Osnovy selektsii polovykh kultur na stiikist do shkidlyvykh orhanizmiv [Barley: methodjljgical approaches and results of breeding for resistance to major diseases and pests. Breeding principles of feld crops for resistance to hazardous organisms]. Kharkiv, pp. 129–137.
8. Holod, S., Ilyichev, O., Illichev, Ju. (2013). Monitorynh stiikosti kolektsiinykh zrazkiv yachmeniu yaroho do boroshnystoi rosy [Monitor the sustainability of collection spring barley to powdery mildew]. Naukovi pratsi Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv [Scientifc works of the Institute of Bioenergy Cultures and Sugar Beet]. Vol. 17(1), pp. 473–477. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/znpicb_2013_17%281%29_116
9. Zayarnaya, О.Yu. (2017). Otsinka stiikosti sortiv yaroho yachmeniu do sazhkovykh khvorob [Evaluation of the resistance of cultivars of spring barley to smuts diseases]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. Fitopatolohiia ta entomolohiia [Bulletin of the Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchaev. Phytopathology and Entomology], no. 1–2, pp. 165–168. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Vkhnau_ento_2017_1-2_29
10. Sabadyn, V.Ya. (2020). Otsenka sortov kollektsii yachmenya yarovogo po tsennyim hozyaystvennyim priznakam dlya selektsii v tsentralnoy Lesostepi Ukrainyi [Evaluation of collection spring barley varieties for valuable economic features for breeding in the central forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Henetychni resursy roslyn [Genetic resources of plants], no. 26, pp. 20–30. Available at: https://doi. org/10.36814/pgr.2020.26.02
11. Kuznetcova, T.E., Shevtcov, V.M., Vasiukov, P.P. (2004). Selektciia iarovogo iachmenia na ustoichivost k bolezniam [Selection of spring barley for disease resistance]. Evoliutciia nauchnykh tekhnologii v rastenievodstve: sb. nauch. tr. Tritikale, iachmen, kukuruza [Evolution of scientifc technologies in crop production: Sat. scientifc tr. in honor of the 90th anniversary of the formation of the Scientifc Research Institute. PP Lukyanenko: in 4 t. Triticale, barley, corn]. Krasnodar, Vol. 2, pp. 144–152.
12. Dreiseitl, A., Wang, J. (2007). Virulence and diversity of Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei in East China. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 01 Apr 2007. 117(4), pp. 357– 368. Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9104-1
13. Lisovyi, M.P., Kononenko, Yu.M. (2007). Polimorfzm virulentnosti zbudnyka boroshnystoi rolsy yachmeniu v tsentralnomu Lisostepu Ukrainy [Virulence polymorphism of causative agent of barley powder in the central forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of Agricultural Science], no. 4, pp. 15–18.
14. Komínková, E., Dreiseitl, A., Malečková, E., Doležel, J., Valárik, M. (2016). Genetic Diversity of Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei in Central Europe and Its Comparison with Australian Population. PLoS One. Published 2016 Nov 22. 11(11), e0167099. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0167099
15. Zeybek, A. (2011). Barley Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe graminis DC F. Sp. Hordei marchal) in the Aegan Region. Turkish journal of feld crops 16 (2011). pp. 39–42. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjfc/issue/17126/179130.
16. Lisovyi, M.P., Kononenko, Yu.M. (2006). Istorychni etapy rozvytku doslidzhen polimorfzmu populfatsii zbudnyka boroshnystoi rosy yaroho yachmeniu [Historical stages of development of polymorphism studies of populations of cauliflower cauliflower]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn [Plant protection and quarantine]. Vol. 52, pp. 49–63.
17. Sabadyn, V.Ya. (2019). Dzherela tsinnykh hospodarskykh oznak sortiv kolektsii yachmeniu yaroho dlia selektsii u tsentralnomu Lisostepu Ukrainy [Sources of valuable crop features of spring barley varieties for breeding in the central forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Ahrobiolohiia [Agrobiology]. Vol. 2, pp. 33–42. Available at: https://doi. org/10.33245/2310-9270-2019-153-2-33-42.
18. Hudzenko, V.M., Vasylkivskyi, S.P., Demydov, O.A., Polishchuk, T.P., Babiy, O.O. (2017). Selektsiia yachmeniu yaroho na pidvyshchennia produktyvnoho ta adaptyvnoho potentsialu [Spring barley breeding for increase in productive and adaptive capacities]. Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo [Selection and seeding]. Vol. 111, pp. 51–61. Available at: http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/selinas_2017_111_7
19. Tavares, L., Carvalho, C., Bassoi, M. (2015). Adaptability and stability as selection criterion for wheat cultivars in Paraná State. Ciências Agrárias, Londrina. Vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 2933–2942. Available at: https://doi.org/10.543 3/16790359.2015v36n5p2933
20. Dontsova, А.А. (2015). Izuchenie zakonomernostey nasledovaniya hozyaystvenno-tsennyih priznakov gibridami F 1 i F2 yarovogo yachmenya v usloviyah Rostovskoy oblasti [Investigation of inheritance patterns of economically valuable traits in F 1 and F2 spring barley hybrids in the Rostov region]. Molodezh i Nauka [Youth and science]. Vol. 1, pp. 1–7.
21. Kompanets, Ye.V., Kozachenko, M.R. (2017). Uspadkuvannja produktyvnosti ta i'i' strukturnyh elementiv u F 1 gibrydiv jachmenju jarogo [Inheritance of performance and its structural components in F1 spring barley hybrids]. Henetychni resursy roslyn [Genetic resources of plants], no. 20, pp. 43–55
22. Nyska, I.M., Petrenkova, V.P. (2018). Uspadkuvannia hibrydamy F1 yachmeniu yaroho stiikosti do biotychnykh chynnykiv ta okremykh elementiv produktyvnosti [Inheritance of resistance to biotic factors and individual performance components by F1 spring barley hybrids]. Naukovi dopovidi Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy [Scientifc reports of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine]. Vol. 1(71). Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/Nd_2018_1_25
23. Zviahintseva, A.M. (2013). Selekcijno-genetychni osoblyvosti stijkosti yachmenyu yarogo do kompleksu biotychnyx chynnykiv u sxidnij chastyni Lisostepu Ukrayiny [Breeding-genetic peculiarities of resistance of barley to a set of biotic factors in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Kharkov, 200 p.
24. Batasheva, B.A., Ibisheva, V.I., Abdullaev, R.A., Kovaleva, O.N., Zveynek, I.A., Radchenko, E.E. (2019). Harakter razvitiya i nasledovaniya polosatoy pyatnistosti listev yachmenya v usloviyah yuzhnogo Dagestana [The nature of the development and inheritance of the striped spottedness of the barley leaves in the conditions of South Dagestan]. Problemyi razvitiya APK regiona [Problems of development of the AIC of the region]. Vol. 2 (38), pp. 21–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15217/issn2079-0996.2019.2.21
25. Bazaliy, G.G., Usyk, L.O., Zhupina, A.Yu., Lavrynenko, Yu.O. (2020). Uspadkuvannia stiikosti do ftopatoheniv hibrydamy pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi v umovakh zroshennia pivdnia Ukrainy [Inheritance of resistance to phytopathogens by hybrids of soft winter wheat in the conditions of irrigation of the south of Ukraine]. Ahrarni innovatsii [Agrarian innovations], no. 2, pp. 5–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2020.2.1
26. Babaiants, L., Meshterkhazy, A., Vekhter, O. (1988). Metodyi selektsii i otsenki ustoychivosti pshenitsyi i yachmenya k boleznyam v stranah-chlenah SEV [Methods for breeding and assessing the resistance of wheat and barley to diseases in CMEA Member States]. Praha, 321 p.
27. Trybel, S.O., Siharova, D.D., Sekun, M.P., Ivashchenko, O.O. (2001). Metodyky vyprobuvannia i zastosuvannia pestytsydiv [Test methods and application of pesticides]. Kyiv, World, 448 p.
28. Grifng, B. (1950). Analysis of quantitative geneaction by constant parent regression and related techniques. Genetics. Vol. 35, рр. 303–321.
29. Beil, G.M., Atkins, R.E. (1965). Inheritance of quantitative characters in grain sorghum. Iowa State Journal. no. 39, 3 p.
30. Matzinger, D.F., Mannand, T.J., Cockerham, C.C. (1962). Diallel cross in Nicotiana tabacum. Crop Science. Vol. 2, pp. 238–286.
31. Fonseca, S., Patterson, F.L. (1968). Hybrid vigor in a seven parent diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Science. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 85–88.
32. Mazer, K., Dzhinks, D. (1985). Biometricheskaya genetika [Biometric genetics]. Moscow, World, 463 p.
33. Singh, H., Sharma, S.N., Sain, R.S. (2004). Heterosis studies for yield and itscomponents in bread wheat over environments. Hereditas. Vol. 141, pp. 106–114.
34. Voskresenskaya, G.S., Shpota, V.I. (1967). Trangressiya priznakov Brassica i metodika kolichestvennogo ucheta etogo yavleniya [Trangression of signs of Brassica and the method of quantitative accounting of this phenomenon]. Dokladyi VASHNIL [Reports Vaschnil], no. 7, pp. 18–20.
35. Dospexov, B.A. (1985). Metody`ka polevogo opыta (s osnovamy`staty`sty`cheskoj obrabotky` rezul`tatov y`ssledovany`j) [Methodology of feld experiment (with bases of statistical processing of research results)]. Moscow, Agropromyzdat, 351 р.
Download this article:
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 sabadyn_1_2021.pdf | 617.94 KB |
YEAR: