You are here
Economic and energy efciency of fungicides and microfertilizers in the cultivation of sugar beet hybrids
The results of determining sugar beet hybrids economic and energy efciency technology growing depending on the use of fungicides and microfertilizers are presented. The research was conducted in 2020–2022 in the “Svitanok” Agrienterprise of Vasylkiv district, Kyiv region. Research was conducted with two sugar beet hybrids (Pushkin, Akatsia), three variants of microfertilizers (control, YaraVita Bortrac 150 (3 l/ ha), YaraVita Mancozin (1 l/ha)) and three schemes of fungicide application (Stefstrobin (0.6 l/ha) + Shtefozal (0.5 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha); Tserkostef (0.5 l/ha) + Shtefstrobin (0.6 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha); Cerkoshtef (0.5 l/ha) + Shtefozal (0.5 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha )) were studied. The evaluation of the fungicides and microfertilizers economic efciency was determined according to the prices for the end of 2022 according to generally accepted methods. The technology of sugar beets growing is generally accepted for the zone of the Right Bank Forest Steppe, except for the methods that were put to study. It was established that in the structure of economic costs during the cultivation of sugar beets, a signifcant part is occupied by the use of mineral fertilizers – 23.7 %, fuel – 18.6 %, plant protection products – 16.3 %, seeds – 13.5 %. In the structure of energy costs, most of it belongs to fuel (27.8 %), mineral fertilizers (26.9 %), equipment (19.7 %) and labor costs (15.7 %). Energy costs for plant protection products and microfertilizers make 4.5 and 0.7 %. The Akatsia hybrid has higher proftability rates (53245.7 UAH/ha), proftableness (164.9 %) and energy efciency ratio (3.6) compared to the Pushkin hybrid (45462.2 UAH/ha, 147.6 % and 3.3). From an economic and energy point of view, the combined use of microfertilizers YaraVita Mancozin (1 l/ha) and fungicides Tserkoshtef, k. s. (0.5 l/ha) + Stefstrobin k.s. (0.6 l/ha)+ Stilvet (0.1 l/ha) is the most appropriate. Efciency, proftability and energy efciency ratio were 51491.3 and 60394.3 UAH/ha, 161.9 and 181.5 %, 3.58 and 3.94, respectively, for hybrids Pushkin and Acacia.
Key words: sugar beets, fungicides, microfertilizers, hybrids, economic efciency, energy efficiency.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-7896Reference:
1. Parubok, N.V. (2016). Burjakivnyctvo v ekonomici sil's'kogospodars'kyh pidpryjemstv [Beet cultivation in the economy of agricultural enterprises]. Global'ni ta nacional'ni problemy ekonomiky [Global and national economic problems]. Issue 10, pp. 455– 459.
2. Lal, B., Rajput, D.S., Tamhankar, M.B., Agarwal, I., Sharma, M.S. (2003). Energy use and output assessment of food-forage production systems. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 189, pp. 57–62. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439- 037X.2003.00004.x
3. Wang, Y.W. (2009). Sustainable agricultural practices: Energy inputs and outputs, pesticide, fertilizer and greenhouse gas management. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. no. 18, pp. 498–500.
4. Falcone, G., Stillitano, T., De Luca, A.I., Di Vita, G., Iofrida, N., Strano, A., Gulisano, G., Pecorino, B., D’Amico, M. (2020). Energetic and Economic Analyses for Agricultural Management Models: The Calabria PGI Clementine Case Study. Energies. 13.1289. DOI: 10.3390/en13051289
5. Lyas, H.M.A., Safa, M., Bailey, A., Rauf, S., Khan, A. (2020). Energy Efciency Outlook of New Zealand Dairy Farming Systems: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Energies. no. 13, 251 p. DOI: 10.3390/en13010251
6. Grabovskyi, M., Lozinskyi, M., Grabovska, T., Roubík H. (2023). Green mass to biogas in Ukraine – bioenergy potential of corn and sweet sorghum. Biomass Conversion and Biorefnery. no. 13, pp. 3309– 3317. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01316-0
7. Erdal, G., Esengün, K., Erdal, H., Gündüz, O. (2007). Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy. no. 1, pp. 35–41.
8. Asgharipour, M., Mondani, F., Riahinia, S. (2012). Energy use efciency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province. Energy. no. 44, pp. 1078– 1084. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.023
9. Karpuk, L.M. (2015). Biologichni ta tehnologichni osnovy intensyfkacii' vyrobnyctva burjakiv cukrovyh u pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrai'ny: avtoref. dys. … d-ra sil's'kogospodars'kyh nauk [Biological and technological bases of intensifcation of sugar beet production in the rightbank forest-steppe of Ukraine: autoref. diss. doctor of agricultural sciences]. Kyiv, 45 p.
10. Abrishambaf, O., Faria, P., Vale, Z., Corchado, J.M. (2019). Energy Scheduling Using Decision Trees and Emulation: Agriculture Irrigation with Run-of-theRiver Hydroelectricity and a PV Case Study. Energies. no. 12, 3987 p. DOI: 10.3390/en12203987
11. Ortiz-Cañavate, J., Hernanz, J.L. (1999). Energy analysis. In CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering; Kitani O., Ed.; American Society of Agricultural Engineers: Michigan, MI, USA. Vol. 3, pp. 13–42.
12. Rozman, Č., Kljajić, M., Pažek, K. (2015). Sugar Beet Production: A System Dynamics Model and Economic Analysis. Organizacija. Vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 145–154. DOI: 10.1515/orga-2015-0017
13. Askarov, V.R. (2016). Vplyv mikrodobryv ta fungicydiv na urozhajnist', jakist' ta efektyvnist' vyroshhuvannja cukrovyh burjakiv [The effect of microfertilizers and fungicides on yield, quality and efciency of sugar beet cultivation]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrai'ny [Scientifc reports of NUBiP of Ukraine]. no. 5. Available at: http://journals.nubip.edu. ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/7241
14. Zherdetskyi, I.M. (2008). Pozakoreneve pidzhyvlennja u procesi formuvannja vrozhaju cukrovogo burjaku. [Foliar fertilization in the process of forming a sugar beet crop]. Zemlerobstvo [Agriculture]. Issue 80, pp. 115–121.
15. Ivanina, V.V. (2014). Energetychna efektyvnist' agrotehnologij za riznyh system udobrennja zerno burjakovoi' sivozminy [Energy efciency of agrotechnologies under different grain fertilization systems of beet crop rotation]. Cukrovi burjaky [Sugar beets]. no. 2, рр. 15–16. Available at: http://nbuv.gov. ua/UJRN/Cb_2012_6_7
16. Firouzi, S., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Zamani, D.M., Ranjber, I. (2022). An Investigation of the Environmental Impacts and Energy-Economic Analysis for Sugar Beet and Sugarcane Production Systems. Sugar Tech. no. 24, pp. 1851–1866. DOI: 10.1007/s12355-022-01135-1
17. Hua, F., Yangyang, L., Cong, F., Peishu, H., Kaiyong, W. (2016). Energy-Use Efciency and Economic Analysis of Sugar Beet Production in China: A Case Study in Xinjiang Province. Sugar Tech. no. 18, pp. 309–316. DOI: 10.1007/s12355-015-0405-y
18. Tóth, M., Holúbek, I., Boháčiková, A. (2017). Impact of Sugar Beet Production on the Economic Performance of Farms in Slovakia. Listy Cukrovarnické a Reparské. no. 133(11), pp. 344–350.
19. Dimitrijević, A., Gavrilović, M., Ivanović, S., Mileusnić, Z., Miodragović, R., Todorović, S. (2020). Energy Use and Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Wheat and Sugar Beet Production in Serbia. Energies. no. 13(9), 2361 p. DOI: 10.3390/en13092361
20. Pulkrábek, J., Kavka, M., Rataj, V., Humpál, J., Nozdrovický, L., Trávníček, Z., Pačuta, V. (2012). The assessment of the economic risks level of sugar beet growing for the farm economy. Agric. Econ. Czech, no. 58, pp. 41–48. DOI: 10.17221/111/2010-AGRICECON
21. Zherdetskyi, I.M. (2009). Pozakoreneve pidzhyvlennja jak sposib pidvyshhennja produktyvnosti cukrovyh burjakiv u livoberezhnij chastyni Lisostepu Ukrai'ny: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-g. nauk [Foliar feeding as a method of increasing the productivity of sugar beets in the left-bank part of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine: avtoref. dys. cand. of agricultural science]. Kyiv, 21 p.
22. Askarov, V.R. (2017). Produktyvnist' gibrydiv burjakiv cukrovyh novogo pokolinnja za vykorystannja kompleksnyh mikrodobryv ta fungicydiv u Lisostepu Ukrai'ny: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-g. nauk [Productivity of sugar beet hybrids of the new generation with the use of complex microfertilizers and fungicides in the Forest Steppe of Ukraine: abstract of the diss. of the candidate of agricultural sciences]. Kyi'v, 21 p.
23. Kostyuchko, S.S., Lykhochvor, V.V. (2013). Urozhajnist' ta cukrystist' cukrovogo burjaku zalezhno vid zastosuvannja fungicydiv [Yield and sugar content of sugar beet depending on the use of fungicides]. Visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu: agronomija [Bulletin of the Lviv National Agrarian University: agronomy]. no. 17(2), рр. 367–371.
24. Roik, M.V., Gizbullin, N.G., Sinchenko, V.M., Prysiazhniuk, O.I. (2014). Metodyky provedennja doslidzhen' u burjakivnyctvi [Research methods in beet growing]. Kyiv, FOP Korzun, 373 p.
25. Metodyka vyprobuvannja i zastosuvannja pestycydiv [Methodology of testing and application of pesticides]. Kyiv, World, 2001, 448 p.
26. Roik, M.V., Kurylo, V.L., Sinchenko, V.M., Pyrkin, V.I., Prysiazhniuk, O.I. (2013). Vyznachennja ekonomichnoi' efektyvnosti tehnologij, novoi' tehniky, vynahodiv ta zavershenyh naukovyh rozrobok v roslynnyctvi [Determining the economic effectiveness of technologies, new techniques, inventions and completed scientifc developments in crop production]. Kyiv, Nilan LTD, 90 p.
27. Tarariko, Yu.O. Nesmashna, O.Ye., Glushchenko, L.D. (2001). Energetychna ocinka system zemlerobstva i tehnologij vyroshhuvannja sil's'kogospodars'kyh kul'tur: metodychni rekomendacii' [Energy assessment of farming systems and technologies for growing agricultural crops]. Kyiv, Nora-print, 60 p.
28. Trutenko, K.V., Nakonechna, K.V. (2019). Perspektyvy rozvytku cukrovoi' galuzi v regionah Ukrai'ny. [Prospects for the development of the sugar industry in the regions of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk tez II Mizhnarodnoi' naukovo-praktychnoi' internetkonferencii' «Konkurentospromozhnist' agrarnogo sektoru v umovah funkcionuvannja Zony vil'noi' torgivli z Jevropejs'kym Sojuzom [Collection of theses of the II International Scientifc and Practical Internet Conference "Competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the conditions of the functioning of the Free Trade Zone with the European Union]. NUBiP of Ukraine, рр. 205–206.
29. Fursa, A.B. (2001). Shljahy pidvyshhennja ekonomichnoi' efektyvnosti cukroburjakovogo vyrobnyctva [Ways to increase the economic efciency of sugar beet production]. Naukovyj visnyk NAU [Scientifc Bulletin of NAU]. Issue 35, рр. 160–164.
30. Grabovskyi, M.B., Pavlichenko, K.V., Kozak, L.A., Kachan, L.M. (2022). Energetychna efektyvnist' vyroshhuvannja gibrydiv kukurudzy dlja vyrobnyctva biogazu za vykorystannja makro- i mikrodobryv [Energy efciency of growing corn hybrids for biogas production using macro- and microfertilizers]. Zernovi kul'tury [Cereal crops]. no. 1, pp. 100–107. DOI: 10.31867/2523-4544/0212
31. Ozkan, B., Kurklu, A., Akcaoz, H. (2004). An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass and Bioenergy. no. 26, pp. 89–95.
Download this article:
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 potapov_1-2023.pdf | 580.22 KB |
YEAR: